Get an audit

Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run

FullEnrich API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP

Lusha API + MCP has a score of 62.6 (B) against FullEnrich API + MCP's 59.8 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is transparency & trust, 18 points.

FullEnrich API + MCPFullEnrich · HTTP API C59.8/100#258 of 452 Lusha API + MCPLusha · HTTP API B62.6/100#215 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick FullEnrich API + MCP for

  • agent ergonomics (+9)

Pick Lusha API + MCP for

  • reliability (+15)
  • schema & documentation (+11)
  • maintenance & community (+14)
  • transparency & trust (+18)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFullEnrich API + MCPLusha API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206075Lusha API + MCP +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27283Lusha API + MCP +11
Agent ergonomics13%16.26051FullEnrich API + MCP +9
Security & auth14%17.55559Lusha API + MCP +4
Payments & pricing10%12.54040even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86882Lusha API + MCP +14
Transparency & trust7%8.86684Lusha API + MCP +18
Negative events≤150-4
Total59.8 · C62.6 · B

Facts side by side

FactFullEnrich API + MCPLusha API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorFullEnrichLusha
Hosted endpointhttps://app.fullenrich.com/api/v2https://api.lusha.com
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
Licencenonenone
Tools exposed1350
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.FullEnrich/fullenrichcom.lusha.mcp/mcp
Last release2026-08-272026-09-23
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

FullEnrich API + MCP

Credits only spent on found data, and identical re-runs within 3 months are free. Enrichment sources are third-party providers the vendor doesn't name.

Lusha API + MCP

API key on every plan, including Free with 40 credits a month. At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches.

Before you call either

FullEnrich API + MCP

  1. Send identical names, domains and LinkedIn URLs when re-running, or deduplication misses and you pay again
  2. Expect 30 to 90 seconds a contact. Use the webhook or poll get_enrichment_results
  3. Ask for mobiles only when needed. They cost 10 credits against 1 for a work email
  4. Call list_industries and list_seniorities before filtering search
  5. Use the 0-credit test contacts in the docs to check an integration

Lusha API + MCP

  1. Batch up to 25 contacts a request. A single bulk request costs 1 credit, not 1 per contact
  2. Ask for phones only when needed. A phone is 5 credits against 1 for an email
  3. Use the Buying Group endpoint. Decision Makers was retired on 2026-09-04
  4. Use /v3/lookalike/contacts for contact lookalikes
  5. Back off exponentially on 429. Free keys stop at 100 requests a day

Other comparisons with FullEnrich API + MCP or Lusha API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report