Head to head · Lead enrichment · October 2026 research run
Clearbit vs Lusha API + MCP
Lusha API + MCP scores 62.3 (B) on agent readiness against Clearbit's 13.5 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do lead enrichment.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 171 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Clearbit F
Best for Only for teams that already hold a Clearbit contract.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Lusha API + MCP loses 4 points for them
Watch for
No public API or MCP server an outside agent can call
Best for Sales teams that want contact and company enrichment, signals and prospecting from one vendor, with a free plan to start.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 30
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 51 against 0
- Security & auth, 59 against 8
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 4
- Transparency & trust, 80 against 66
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Clearbit | Lusha API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 75 | Lusha API + MCP +45 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 0 | 83 | Lusha API + MCP +83 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 51 | Lusha API + MCP +51 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 8 | 59 | Lusha API + MCP +51 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 40 | Lusha API + MCP +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 4 | 82 | Lusha API + MCP +78 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 66 | 80 | Lusha API + MCP +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | F 13.5/100 | B 62.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Clearbit | Lusha API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | HubSpot, Inc. | Lusha |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.lusha.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Clearbit Terms of Service (30 May 2025), provided by HubSpot, Inc. under the Clearbit brand | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 50 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | com.lusha.mcp/mcp |
| Last release | 2025-12-08 | 2026-09-23 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-05-30 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-31 | 2026-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Clearbit
There is no public API or MCP server an outside agent can call today. Clearbit's APIs still run for existing customers behind a login, and its free tools and Logo API were retired in 2025. HubSpot's Breeze Intelligence is the route for new buyers, through HubSpot rather than Clearbit.
Lusha API + MCP
API key on every plan, including Free with 40 credits a month. At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches.
Before you call either
Clearbit
- Don't plan to call Clearbit. Hand the task to a person with an existing Clearbit account, or use HubSpot's Breeze Intelligence through HubSpot
- Replace logo.clearbit.com links, which stopped working after 8 December 2025
Lusha API + MCP
- Batch up to 25 contacts a request. A single bulk request costs 1 credit, not 1 per contact
- Ask for phones only when needed. A phone is 5 credits against 1 for an email
- Use the Buying Group endpoint. Decision Makers was retired on 2026-09-04
- Use
/v3/lookalike/contactsfor contact lookalikes - Back off exponentially on 429. Free keys stop at 100 requests a day
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Clearbit or Lusha API + MCP?
Lusha API + MCP scores 62.3 (B) on agent readiness against Clearbit's 13.5 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Do Clearbit and Lusha API + MCP need an API key?
Clearbit needs an API key. Lusha API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Clearbit and Lusha API + MCP without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Clearbit. Lusha API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.lusha.com.
Other comparisons with Clearbit or Lusha API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Clay vs Lusha API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs Lusha API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs People Data Labs
- Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Lusha API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clearbit vs Coresignal API + MCP
- Clearbit vs Crustdata API + MCP
- Clearbit vs Dropcontact API + MCP
- Clearbit vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Clearbit vs Explorium AgentSource
- Clearbit vs FullContact
- Clearbit vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Clearbit vs Fuse MCP
- Clearbit vs Gojiberry
- Clearbit vs Hunter API + MCP
- Clearbit vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Clearbit vs People Data Labs
- Clearbit vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Clearbit vs RocketReach API
- Clearbit vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullContact vs Lusha API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/clearbit-vs-lusha.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/clearbit.json·/api/v1/tools/lusha.json - From a terminal
anchor compare clearbit lusha(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "clearbit", "b": "lusha"}at/mcp, no key