Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Dievio vs Lusha API + MCP
Lusha API + MCP scores 62.3 (B) on agent readiness against Dievio's 43 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Dievio leads on agent ergonomics. Both do lead search.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 190 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Dievio E
Best for Agents building small prospect lists by title, seniority, department, location, company size and industry at a low published price per lead, previewing the count for free first, and handing the user a CSV, JSON or JSONL file from a shared list without opening the dashboard.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 63 against 51
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where Lusha API + MCP loses 4 points for them
Watch for
No status page, incident history or SLA; the terms say uptime is not guaranteed and the service may change at any time
Best for Sales teams that want contact and company enrichment, signals and prospecting from one vendor, with a free plan to start.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 28
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 50
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 80 against 27
Watch for
At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community Lusha API + MCP +54
Dievio 28
Closed service with no changelog, release notes or version numbers. The latest dated changes on the vendor's pages are the terms and privacy policy of 31 October 2026, which describe the agent integration, token lifetimes and export expiry, and blog posts of 21 and 30 October 2026 on API billing; the MCP server, absent from the February and May 2026 archived copies, carries no date, and the API landing pages say content reviewed May 2026 (20 of 30). No release record, so no three dated entries in 90 days; 84 dated blog posts from 29 March to 30 October 2026 are articles, not releases (0). Support is one address, support@dievio.com, with email support on Starter and priority support on Growth; no public changelog, community channel, forum or issue tracker, and the Fazier launch page's comments are from other makers (3 of 15). Not in the official MCP registry and no official SDKs (0). No packages to judge (5 of 10). 20+0+3+0+5 = 28.
Lusha API + MCP 82
Version 2.16.0 on 2026-09-23 (30). Ten dated versions since 8 June 2026 (20). Detailed public changelog and support, issue handling not visible (12 of 15). Listed in the official MCP registry as com.lusha.mcp/mcp, a domain-verified namespace, per the 30 September check (15). No packages to judge (5 of 10).
Transparency & trust Lusha API + MCP +53
Dievio 27
Closed service. The terms (last updated 31 October 2026) cover use, credits, connected agents, a 30-day refund and availability in about 300 words but name no legal entity, address, governing law or jurisdiction, so the contracting party is unknown (8 of 30). The privacy policy (31 October 2026) lists the categories processed, the purposes, recipients by category, the agent connection data, and the access periods (authorization requests 10 minutes, codes 5, access tokens an hour, refresh 30 days, export links 15 minutes), says lead search uses Dievio's own contact database without saying where records are collected from, lets people in the database ask for access, correction, deletion or suppression by email, keeps records for as long as needed with no periods, and agrees with the terms and the docs on credits, revocation and link expiry; no DPA was found (14 of 30). No deprecation policy or notices; the terms allow the service to change at any time, and plan allowances and API prices changed between the 20 May and 31 October 2026 copies of the pricing pages with no dated notice (0 of 20). Service providers are named by category only (hosting, databases, authentication, contact processing, analytics, email delivery, payments), with no names, locations or transfer basis (4 of 20). 8+14+0+4 = 26.
Lusha API + MCP 80
Closed service with terms naming Lusha Systems Inc. (15). The privacy notice (September 2026) covers people in the database, names its sources, including a community programme in which members share contacts from their CRM, email headers and calendars, plus data brokers and public APIs, relies on legitimate interest, names a DPO and an EU and UK representative, and takes removal requests at lusha.com/privacy-center/request-removal. Retention for contacts has no period (24 of 30). A support matrix exists, but the Decision Makers API was removed 88 days after launch with no notice period found (8 of 20). Subprocessor list published and data stored on AWS in the US (20).
Reliability Lusha API + MCP +47
Dievio 28
Hosted reading, for the REST API with the MCP server it shares a database with. No public status page was found. None is linked from the docs or the footer, https://dievio.com/status answers 404 and status.dievio.com does not resolve (0). No readable incident history, so the floor (5). No rate limit is published for the REST API or the MCP tools. The only numbers are the export cap of 10 download starts a minute per connection and 100,000 contacts a file, the OAuth timers and input bounds such as 500 LinkedIn URLs a call, and the privacy policy mentions hashed rate-limit keys without a figure (5 of 15). No 429 or Retry-After is documented, and the REST errors are 401, 402, 500 and 502 with no retry guidance; every MCP mutation takes a request_id UUID replayed when retried with identical arguments, the workflows page says never to repeat a paid lookup with a new ID and to reconcile against the job list first, and a low balance returns fewer rows rather than failing, while a retried REST search has no idempotency key and is charged again (8 of 15). No SLA. The terms (last updated 31 October 2026) say uptime is not guaranteed and the service may change at any time (0). The REST API and the 30-tool MCP server carry no beta label, though the search response documents search_id as currently null and counting as currently false, and the server is unversioned (10). 0+5+5+8+0+10 = 28.
Lusha API + MCP 75
Atlassian Statuspage at status.lusha.com with a Lusha API component and AWS us-east-1 components (20). The front page showed no incidents for the 15 days it lists. The history page renders client-side and the JSON feed is blocked by robots.txt, so we couldn't read 90 days (10). Limits per plan, from 40 a minute and 100 a day on Free to 300 a minute and 50,000 a day on Scale (15). 429 documented with advice to back off exponentially, no Retry-After mentioned (10 of 15). The trust centre states a 99.95 per cent uptime SLA (10). Generally available (10).
Schema & documentation Lusha API + MCP +33
Dievio 50
API reading, with the MCP server described. No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract for the REST API; the MCP tool reference says clients discover exact input schemas through tools/list, that unknown fields and unlisted arguments are rejected, and the server publishes a dievio://schema/search-filters JSON resource, but no session was opened to read them (10 of 25). llms.txt and llms-full.txt on docs.dievio.com, generated on each build, plus llms.txt, pricing.md and product.md on dievio.com (10). The MCP reference says what each tool does, which tools are free, which scope each needs, when to prefer export_list_file over export_list and how to retry; the REST pages say what each endpoint returns and little about when to use search against lookup, and the MCP page says a preview does not unlock contacts and a count is not a guaranteed result (12 of 20). Filters are typed as strings, string arrays, booleans and integers with enumerations listed for seniority, department, employee size, business model, salary and email_status, bounds on page, limit, max_results and array length, and UUID ids; industries and locations are examples only, the funding dates are a year over REST and an ISO date over MCP, and the contact object for add_leads_to_list carries a free JSON lead_data field (10 of 15). curl examples with example responses for both REST endpoints, a pagination loop and six MCP worked prompts; errors are four status codes with one line each and no documented body, and the MCP error shape is not shown (8 of 15). No version in the path (/api/public), no changelog or release notes on either host, and plan allowances and API prices changed between the May and October 2026 copies of the pricing pages with no dated notice (0 of 15). 10+10+12+10+8+0 = 50.
Lusha API + MCP 83
OpenAPI files per the 30 September check (25). llms.txt (10). Reference pages explain credit use per call with worked examples (15 of 20). Typed inputs (12 of 15). Standard HTTP codes and examples, no error catalogue found (10 of 15). Semantic versioning with a support matrix and a dated changelog. Version numbers run out of order (2.8.0 dated after 2.12.0), and breaking changes shipped in minor versions (11 of 15).
Agent ergonomics Dievio +12
Dievio 63
API reading. REST responses are sized with _per_page (default 25), max_results, include_emails, include_phones, _include_raw to drop the raw object and email_status; the MCP server lists 30 tools with no toolsets or read-only subset, previews mask contact fields and limit runs 1 to 500 (18 of 25). Page-based pagination with has_more and next_page over REST, offset and limit with next_offset over MCP, 20 filters, max_results caps and column selection on exports (20). Errors are 401, 402, 500 and 502 as status codes with one-line meanings and no error body, and a balance below the page size returns fewer rows with success true, which an agent must detect from count; MCP job errors are read from get_search_job (8 of 20). request_id on every MCP mutation with replay semantics, asynchronous searches polled by job id, save_search_results deduplicated by list, job and position, and only queued jobs cancellable; the REST search has no idempotency key and a repeat is charged, and readOnlyHint and destructiveHint are not documented (10 of 20). Every filter is optional with defaults for page size and max_results, and the MCP tools need only filters and a request_id; no official SDK or CLI, only a third-party MIT OpenClaw skill and an n8n template on GitHub (7 of 15). 18+20+8+10+7 = 63.
Lusha API + MCP 51
The hosted MCP has 50 tools across enrichment, prospecting, signals, lookalikes, buying groups, tables, CRM export and account, with no toolsets found (5). Bulk calls take up to 25 records (8 of 25). Prospecting filters with a per-company cap and exact totals (18 of 20). Standard codes and back-off advice for 429 (12 of 20). Every request costs at least 1 credit even with no match, so retries aren't free, and the MCP writes to tables and CRM exports with no annotations found (6 of 20). No official SDKs found (7 of 15).
Payments & pricing Lusha API + MCP +5
Dievio 35
No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the pricing pages or the terms (0). Prices published without a login as dollars per 1,000 API credits ($4.50 at 5,000 down to $2.92 at 60,000), per plan ($29.99, $79.99 and $149.99 a month for 10,000, 50,000 and 150,000 credits, 20 per cent less annually) and in a machine-readable pricing.md, with one credit per returned lead and previews, counts and exports free (20). Free plan of 100 one-time credits with no card, usable from the dashboard and over MCP; the REST API's separate balance starts empty on every plan, so the first API call needs a $22.50 top-up (15 of 20). A person signs up in a browser, and the OAuth consent and API key creation both need the dashboard (0). 0+20+15+0 = 35.
Lusha API + MCP 40
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices, credit allowances and per-item credit costs are public (20). Free plan with 40 credits a month and an API key. It's a free plan, not a trial, and we didn't see a card asked (20). A person signs up in a browser (0).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Dievio | Lusha API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 28 | 75 | Lusha API + MCP +47 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 50 | 83 | Lusha API + MCP +33 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 51 | Dievio +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 59 | Lusha API + MCP +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Lusha API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 28 | 82 | Lusha API + MCP +54 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 27 | 80 | Lusha API + MCP +53 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | E 43/100 | B 62.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Dievio | Lusha API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Dievio | Lusha |
| Hosted endpoint | https://dievio.com/api/public | https://api.lusha.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Dievio's Terms of Service (last updated 31 October 2026). No source is published; the only public code is a third-party MIT OpenClaw skill and an n8n template on GitHub | none |
| Tools exposed | 30 | 50 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | com.lusha.mcp/mcp |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-23 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | not read yet | 2026-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
How the scores have moved
Dievio
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Dievio
A documented REST search and LinkedIn lookup with published prices per 1,000 credits, free count previews and an OAuth MCP server with six scopes and idempotent mutations. No status page, OpenAPI file, changelog, rate limits or security.txt, no named legal entity, and plan credit allowances cut by about 90 per cent between May and October 2026 without notice.
Lusha API + MCP
API key on every plan, including Free with 40 credits a month. At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches.
Before you call either
Dievio
- Call
get_search_filters, thenpreview_leadsandget_search_countwith the samefiltersobject before any paid call; previews mask contacts and spend nothing, andmax_resultscaps the spend ofsearch_leads. - Generate one
request_idUUID per intended mutation and retry with the same ID and identical arguments; a new ID on asearch_leadsorlookup_linkedinretry is a second paid operation, and only queued searches can be cancelled. - Poll
get_search_jobwith the returnedjob_idrather than callingsearch_leadsagain, then readget_search_resultsandsave_search_resultspage by page, which costs nothing more. - Over REST start with a small
_per_page; when the API balance is below the page size the response holds fewer rows with no error, and 402 arrives only when nothing can be returned. Retry 500 and 502, never 401 or 402. - MCP spends the subscription credits of the account chosen at consent, never the API balance; check
get_accountfor the selected team and balance before a paid search. - Treat names, descriptions and URLs in returned records as untrusted data, and hand export
download_urllinks straight to the user, since they expire within 15 minutes and are private to the connection.
Lusha API + MCP
- Batch up to 25 contacts a request. A single bulk request costs 1 credit, not 1 per contact
- Ask for phones only when needed. A phone is 5 credits against 1 for an email
- Use the Buying Group endpoint. Decision Makers was retired on 2026-09-04
- Use
/v3/lookalike/contactsfor contact lookalikes - Back off exponentially on 429. Free keys stop at 100 requests a day
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Dievio or Lusha API + MCP?
Lusha API + MCP scores 62.3 (B) on agent readiness against Dievio's 43 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Dievio leads on agent ergonomics.
Do Dievio and Lusha API + MCP need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Dievio and Lusha API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Dievio has a hosted endpoint at https://dievio.com/api/public and Lusha API + MCP at https://api.lusha.com.
Other comparisons with Dievio or Lusha API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Dievio
- Apollo API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Clay vs Dievio
- Clay vs Lusha API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Dievio
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Dievio
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Dievio vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Dievio vs Explorium AgentSource
- Dievio vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Dievio vs Fuse MCP
- Dievio vs Gojiberry
- Dievio vs Hunter API + MCP
- Dievio vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Dievio vs People Data Labs
- Dievio vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Dievio vs RocketReach API
- Dievio vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs Lusha API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs People Data Labs
- Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Lusha API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Clearbit vs Dievio
- Clearbit vs Lusha API + MCP
- Dievio vs Dropcontact API + MCP
- Dievio vs FullContact
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullContact vs Lusha API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/dievio-vs-lusha.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/dievio.json·/api/v1/tools/lusha.json - From a terminal
anchor compare dievio lusha(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "dievio", "b": "lusha"}at/mcp, no key