Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
Lusha API + MCP has a score of 62.6 (B) against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 56 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 56 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for
- agent ergonomics (+17)
Pick Lusha API + MCP for
- reliability (+10)
- schema & documentation (+7)
- security & auth (+19)
- maintenance & community (+56)
- transparency & trust (+23)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Lusha API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 75 | Lusha API + MCP +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 83 | Lusha API + MCP +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 51 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 59 | Lusha API + MCP +19 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 26 | 82 | Lusha API + MCP +56 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 84 | Lusha API + MCP +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | 56 · C | 62.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Lusha API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Enrich Layer | Lusha |
| Hosted endpoint | https://enrichlayer.com/api/v2 | https://api.lusha.com |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | none |
| Tools exposed | 25 | 50 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | com.lusha.mcp/mcp |
| Last release | 2026-06-19 | 2026-09-23 |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 26 npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Enrich Layer API + MCP
Pay-as-you-go credits from $10, non-expiring unless idle for 18 months. Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses.
Lusha API + MCP
API key on every plan, including Free with 40 credits a month. At least 1 credit per request even when nothing matches.
Before you call either
Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Top up once before testing. Trial keys run at 2 requests a minute
- Set the person profile timeout to at least 100 seconds
- Ask for
extra, personal emails or phone numbers only when needed, since each adds credits - Use
callback_urlon slow lookups such as work email instead of holding the connection - Map old Proxycurl paths with the transition guide rather than guessing
Lusha API + MCP
- Batch up to 25 contacts a request. A single bulk request costs 1 credit, not 1 per contact
- Ask for phones only when needed. A phone is 5 credits against 1 for an email
- Use the Buying Group endpoint. Decision Makers was retired on 2026-09-04
- Use
/v3/lookalike/contactsfor contact lookalikes - Back off exponentially on 429. Free keys stop at 100 requests a day
Other comparisons with Enrich Layer API + MCP or Lusha API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/enrich-layer.json·/api/v1/tools/lusha.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/enrich-layer-vs-lusha.md