Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Enrich Layer API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
ZoomInfo API + MCP scores 72.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 55.8 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do lead search.
Which one, for what
Good for Teams migrating Proxycurl code or doing per-profile lookups at low unit cost without a subscription.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses
Good for Sales and marketing agents that need company, contact, intent and business-event data from one vendor, with free search before paid enrichment.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 87 against 65
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 76
- Security & auth, 65 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 76 against 26
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 58
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
The Licence Terms and Conditions bar disclosing benchmark results and automated access outside ZoomInfo's own tools without written approval
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Enrich Layer API + MCP | ZoomInfo API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 87 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 84 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 71 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 65 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 26 | 76 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +50 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 58 | 75 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.8 · C | 72.2 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Enrich Layer API + MCP | ZoomInfo API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Enrich Layer | ZoomInfo Technologies LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | https://enrichlayer.com/api/v2 | https://api.zoominfo.com/gtm |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under ZoomInfo's Licence Terms and Conditions. The GTM CLI on GitHub is MIT |
| Tools exposed | 25 | 26 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-06-19 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-06-09 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-06-09 | 2025-10-13 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 26 npm/wk | 534 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Enrich Layer API + MCP
Pay-as-you-go credits from $10, non-expiring unless idle for 18 months. Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses.
ZoomInfo API + MCP
Search, lookup and similar-record calls cost no credits, and a free account with 1,000 data and 1,000 AI credits needs no card. OAuth carries 20 scopes and limits are published per package. The Licence Terms and Conditions bar disclosing benchmark results, and the two documentation sites disagree on batch sizes and rate-limit headers.
Before you call either
Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Top up once before testing. Trial keys run at 2 requests a minute
- Set the person profile timeout to at least 100 seconds
- Ask for
extra, personal emails or phone numbers only when needed, since each adds credits - Use
callback_urlon slow lookups such as work email instead of holding the connection - Map old Proxycurl paths with the transition guide rather than guessing
ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Call Lookup first and pass the returned IDs to Search. Unknown industry, metro or topic strings are rejected with a 422
- Search before Enrich. Search is free, and each newly enriched record costs one data credit
- Request only the scopes the task needs in the
scopeparameter of the token call. Omitting it grants every scope configured on the app - On 429 read
X-RateLimit-Rejected-Bucketand wait forRetry-After. An exhausted hourly window can mean a wait of several hundred seconds - Turn off model training in the AI client before connecting the MCP server. ZoomInfo prohibits MCP data being used for training
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Enrich Layer API + MCP or ZoomInfo API + MCP?
ZoomInfo API + MCP scores 72.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 55.8 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do Enrich Layer API + MCP and ZoomInfo API + MCP need an API key?
Enrich Layer API + MCP needs an API key. ZoomInfo API + MCP uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Enrich Layer API + MCP and ZoomInfo API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Enrich Layer API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://enrichlayer.com/api/v2 and ZoomInfo API + MCP at https://api.zoominfo.com/gtm.
Other comparisons with Enrich Layer API + MCP or ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs People Data Labs
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- People Data Labs vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Prospeo API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/enrich-layer-vs-zoominfo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/enrich-layer.json·/api/v1/tools/zoominfo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare enrich-layer zoominfo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "enrich-layer", "b": "zoominfo"}at/mcp, no key