Get an audit

Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run

Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP

LeadMagic API + MCP has a score of 60.5 (C) against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 56 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 39 points.

Enrich Layer API + MCPEnrich Layer · HTTP API C56/100#309 of 452 LeadMagic API + MCPLeadMagic · HTTP API C60.5/100#247 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for

  • reliability (+10)
  • agent ergonomics (+7)
  • payments & pricing (+20)

Pick LeadMagic API + MCP for

  • schema & documentation (+17)
  • security & auth (+20)
  • maintenance & community (+39)
  • transparency & trust (+5)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runEnrich Layer API + MCPLeadMagic API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206555Enrich Layer API + MCP +10
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27693LeadMagic API + MCP +17
Agent ergonomics13%16.26861Enrich Layer API + MCP +7
Security & auth14%17.54060LeadMagic API + MCP +20
Payments & pricing10%12.54020Enrich Layer API + MCP +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82665LeadMagic API + MCP +39
Transparency & trust7%8.86166LeadMagic API + MCP +5
Negative events≤1500
Total56 · C60.5 · C

Facts side by side

FactEnrich Layer API + MCPLeadMagic API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorEnrich LayerLeadMagic
Hosted endpointhttps://enrichlayer.com/api/v2https://api.leadmagic.io
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per usePaid
x402nono
LicenceMITnone
Tools exposed2548
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-06-192026-09-17
Popularity0 stars, 26 npm/wknone
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Enrich Layer API + MCP

Pay-as-you-go credits from $10, non-expiring unless idle for 18 months. Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses.

LeadMagic API + MCP

RFC 9457 problem-details errors with request_id, and Retry-After on 429. No free tier or trial credits, plans from $99 a month.

Before you call either

Enrich Layer API + MCP

  1. Top up once before testing. Trial keys run at 2 requests a minute
  2. Set the person profile timeout to at least 100 seconds
  3. Ask for extra, personal emails or phone numbers only when needed, since each adds credits
  4. Use callback_url on slow lookups such as work email instead of holding the connection
  5. Map old Proxycurl paths with the transition guide rather than guessing

LeadMagic API + MCP

  1. Call preview_cost before bulk work. It's free
  2. Read X-Credits-Remaining after each call instead of polling the balance
  3. Treat 402 as out of credits and wait out Retry-After on 429
  4. Keep credit-free search under 13,333 calls a day per account
  5. Retry unknown validations later. They cost nothing

Other comparisons with Enrich Layer API + MCP or LeadMagic API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report