Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Crustdata API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
LeadMagic API + MCP has a score of 60.5 (C) against Crustdata API + MCP's 53.5 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 15 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Crustdata API + MCP for
- agent ergonomics (+12)
Pick LeadMagic API + MCP for
- reliability (+10)
- payments & pricing (+15)
- transparency & trust (+10)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Crustdata API + MCP | LeadMagic API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 55 | LeadMagic API + MCP +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 93 | LeadMagic API + MCP +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 73 | 61 | Crustdata API + MCP +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 60 | LeadMagic API + MCP +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 5 | 20 | LeadMagic API + MCP +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 67 | 65 | Crustdata API + MCP +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 66 | LeadMagic API + MCP +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 53.5 · D | 60.5 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Crustdata API + MCP | LeadMagic API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Crustdata | LeadMagic |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.crustdata.com | https://api.leadmagic.io |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 48 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-17 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Crustdata API + MCP
Per-field credit prices, readable per account from /account/endpoints, and X-Credits-Used on every response. No status page and no SLA.
LeadMagic API + MCP
RFC 9457 problem-details errors with request_id, and Retry-After on 429. No free tier or trial credits, plans from $99 a month.
Before you call either
Crustdata API + MCP
- Always send
x-api-version: 2025-11-01. Unpinned calls get the latest version - Call
/account/endpointsfirst to see what your plan enables and what each field costs - Ask only for the premium field groups you need, since each one bills
- Poll
GET /batch/{id}before submitting more batch jobs. Active jobs count against a cap of 5 to 30 - Read the
crustdata://catalogresource before calling MCP tools
LeadMagic API + MCP
- Call
preview_costbefore bulk work. It's free - Read
X-Credits-Remainingafter each call instead of polling the balance - Treat 402 as out of credits and wait out Retry-After on 429
- Keep credit-free search under 13,333 calls a day per account
- Retry
unknownvalidations later. They cost nothing
Other comparisons with Crustdata API + MCP or LeadMagic API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Crustdata API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Crustdata API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Dropcontact API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/crustdata.json·/api/v1/tools/leadmagic.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/crustdata-vs-leadmagic.md