Get an audit

Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run

FullEnrich API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP

LeadMagic API + MCP has a score of 60.5 (C) against FullEnrich API + MCP's 59.8 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 21 points.

FullEnrich API + MCPFullEnrich · HTTP API C59.8/100#258 of 452 LeadMagic API + MCPLeadMagic · HTTP API C60.5/100#247 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick FullEnrich API + MCP for

  • reliability (+5)
  • payments & pricing (+20)

Pick LeadMagic API + MCP for

  • schema & documentation (+21)
  • security & auth (+5)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFullEnrich API + MCPLeadMagic API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206055FullEnrich API + MCP +5
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27293LeadMagic API + MCP +21
Agent ergonomics13%16.26061LeadMagic API + MCP +1
Security & auth14%17.55560LeadMagic API + MCP +5
Payments & pricing10%12.54020FullEnrich API + MCP +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86865FullEnrich API + MCP +3
Transparency & trust7%8.86666even
Negative events≤1500
Total59.8 · C60.5 · C

Facts side by side

FactFullEnrich API + MCPLeadMagic API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorFullEnrichLeadMagic
Hosted endpointhttps://app.fullenrich.com/api/v2https://api.leadmagic.io
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
Licencenonenone
Tools exposed1348
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.FullEnrich/fullenrichnot listed
Last release2026-08-272026-09-17
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

FullEnrich API + MCP

Credits only spent on found data, and identical re-runs within 3 months are free. Enrichment sources are third-party providers the vendor doesn't name.

LeadMagic API + MCP

RFC 9457 problem-details errors with request_id, and Retry-After on 429. No free tier or trial credits, plans from $99 a month.

Before you call either

FullEnrich API + MCP

  1. Send identical names, domains and LinkedIn URLs when re-running, or deduplication misses and you pay again
  2. Expect 30 to 90 seconds a contact. Use the webhook or poll get_enrichment_results
  3. Ask for mobiles only when needed. They cost 10 credits against 1 for a work email
  4. Call list_industries and list_seniorities before filtering search
  5. Use the 0-credit test contacts in the docs to check an integration

LeadMagic API + MCP

  1. Call preview_cost before bulk work. It's free
  2. Read X-Credits-Remaining after each call instead of polling the balance
  3. Treat 402 as out of credits and wait out Retry-After on 429
  4. Keep credit-free search under 13,333 calls a day per account
  5. Retry unknown validations later. They cost nothing

Other comparisons with FullEnrich API + MCP or LeadMagic API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report