# FullEnrich API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP (slim)

> LeadMagic API + MCP has a score of 60.5 (C) against FullEnrich API + MCP's 59.8 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 21 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-leadmagic.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-leadmagic.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-leadmagic
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

LeadMagic API + MCP has a score of 60.5 (C) against FullEnrich API + MCP's 59.8 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 21 points.

- FullEnrich API + MCP: C 59.8, rank #258 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/fullenrich.min.md
- LeadMagic API + MCP: C 60.5, rank #247 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/leadmagic.min.md
- Pick FullEnrich API + MCP for reliability (+5), payments & pricing (+20). Pick LeadMagic API + MCP for schema & documentation (+21), security & auth (+5).

| Category | FullEnrich API + MCP | LeadMagic API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 55 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 72 | 93 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 60 | 61 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 55 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 65 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 66 | 66 |