Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run

FullEnrich API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP

FullEnrich API + MCP has a score of 59.8 (C) against Prospeo API + MCP's 51.1 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 34 points.

Which one, for what

Pick FullEnrich API + MCP for

  • reliability (+25)
  • schema & documentation (+11)
  • maintenance & community (+34)
  • transparency & trust (+21)

Pick Prospeo API + MCP for

  • agent ergonomics (+19)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFullEnrich API + MCPProspeo API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206035FullEnrich API + MCP +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27261FullEnrich API + MCP +11
Agent ergonomics13%16.26079Prospeo API + MCP +19
Security & auth14%17.55554FullEnrich API + MCP +1
Payments & pricing10%12.54040even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86834FullEnrich API + MCP +34
Transparency & trust7%8.86645FullEnrich API + MCP +21
Negative events≤1500
Total59.8 · C51.1 · D

Facts side by side

FactFullEnrich API + MCPProspeo API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorFullEnrichProspeo
Hosted endpointhttps://app.fullenrich.com/api/v2https://api.prospeo.io
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicencenoneMIT
Tools exposed138
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.FullEnrich/fullenrichio.prospeo/prospeo-mcp-server
Last release2026-08-272026-06-01
Popularitynone0 stars, 641 npm/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

FullEnrich API + MCP

Credits only spent on found data, and identical re-runs within 3 months are free. Enrichment sources are third-party providers the vendor doesn't name.

Prospeo API + MCP

MCP tool descriptions say when to use each tool, its credit cost and the next call. No status page, SLA or changelog.

Before you call either

FullEnrich API + MCP

  1. Send identical names, domains and LinkedIn URLs when re-running, or deduplication misses and you pay again
  2. Expect 30 to 90 seconds a contact. Use the webhook or poll get_enrichment_results
  3. Ask for mobiles only when needed. They cost 10 credits against 1 for a work email
  4. Call list_industries and list_seniorities before filtering search
  5. Use the 0-credit test contacts in the docs to check an integration

Prospeo API + MCP

  1. Call search_suggestions before using location, technology or industry filters, or the search returns nothing
  2. Pass person_id values from search into bulk_enrich_person, 25 at a time
  3. Branch on the body error_code, not the HTTP status, which is 400 for most failures
  4. Set enrich_mobile only when needed. A mobile costs 10 credits against 1 for an email
  5. Use Enrich Person. The old Email Finder endpoint was removed in March 2026

Other comparisons with FullEnrich API + MCP or Prospeo API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.