Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run

Apollo API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP

Apollo API + MCP has a score of 63.6 (B) against Prospeo API + MCP's 51.1 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is reliability, 30 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Apollo API + MCP for

  • reliability (+30)
  • schema & documentation (+26)
  • security & auth (+6)
  • maintenance & community (+24)
  • transparency & trust (+30)

Pick Prospeo API + MCP for

  • agent ergonomics (+14)
  • payments & pricing (+10)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runApollo API + MCPProspeo API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206535Apollo API + MCP +30
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28761Apollo API + MCP +26
Agent ergonomics13%16.26579Prospeo API + MCP +14
Security & auth14%17.56054Apollo API + MCP +6
Payments & pricing10%12.53040Prospeo API + MCP +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85834Apollo API + MCP +24
Transparency & trust7%8.87545Apollo API + MCP +30
Negative events≤1500
Total63.6 · B51.1 · D

Facts side by side

FactApollo API + MCPProspeo API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorApollo.ioProspeo
Hosted endpointhttps://api.apollo.io/api/v1https://api.prospeo.io
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicencenoneMIT
Tools exposednone8
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.apolloio/apollo-mcpio.prospeo/prospeo-mcp-server
Last releasenone2026-06-01
Popularity25 stars0 stars, 641 npm/wk
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Apollo API + MCP

People search costs 0 credits, up to 100 records a page and 50,000 a query. Headless MCP use needs a master key that reaches every endpoint.

Prospeo API + MCP

MCP tool descriptions say when to use each tool, its credit cost and the next call. No status page, SLA or changelog.

Before you call either

Apollo API + MCP

  1. Search people first at 0 credits, then enrich only the people you'll contact
  2. Branch on error_details.code and wait retry_after_seconds from the suggestions after a 429
  3. Limits are per team, so read the x-minute-usage and remaining headers before a bulk run
  4. Use a scoped key with only the endpoints the job needs. A master key reaches everything
  5. Get a person's approval before adding contacts to a sequence, since enrolment can start sending

Prospeo API + MCP

  1. Call search_suggestions before using location, technology or industry filters, or the search returns nothing
  2. Pass person_id values from search into bulk_enrich_person, 25 at a time
  3. Branch on the body error_code, not the HTTP status, which is 400 for most failures
  4. Set enrich_mobile only when needed. A mobile costs 10 credits against 1 for an email
  5. Use Enrich Person. The old Email Finder endpoint was removed in March 2026

Other comparisons with Apollo API + MCP or Prospeo API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.