Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Apollo API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
Apollo API + MCP has a score of 63.6 (B) against LeadMagic API + MCP's 60.5 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is reliability, 10 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Apollo API + MCP for
- reliability (+10)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- transparency & trust (+9)
Pick LeadMagic API + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+6)
- maintenance & community (+7)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Apollo API + MCP | LeadMagic API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 55 | Apollo API + MCP +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 93 | LeadMagic API + MCP +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 61 | Apollo API + MCP +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Apollo API + MCP +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 65 | LeadMagic API + MCP +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 75 | 66 | Apollo API + MCP +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.6 · B | 60.5 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Apollo API + MCP | LeadMagic API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Apollo.io | LeadMagic |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.apollo.io/api/v1 | https://api.leadmagic.io |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 48 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.apolloio/apollo-mcp | not listed |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-17 |
| Popularity | 25 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Apollo API + MCP
People search costs 0 credits, up to 100 records a page and 50,000 a query. Headless MCP use needs a master key that reaches every endpoint.
LeadMagic API + MCP
RFC 9457 problem-details errors with request_id, and Retry-After on 429. No free tier or trial credits, plans from $99 a month.
Before you call either
Apollo API + MCP
- Search people first at 0 credits, then enrich only the people you'll contact
- Branch on
error_details.codeand waitretry_after_secondsfrom the suggestions after a 429 - Limits are per team, so read the
x-minute-usageand remaining headers before a bulk run - Use a scoped key with only the endpoints the job needs. A master key reaches everything
- Get a person's approval before adding contacts to a sequence, since enrolment can start sending
LeadMagic API + MCP
- Call
preview_costbefore bulk work. It's free - Read
X-Credits-Remainingafter each call instead of polling the balance - Treat 402 as out of credits and wait out Retry-After on 429
- Keep credit-free search under 13,333 calls a day per account
- Retry
unknownvalidations later. They cost nothing
Other comparisons with Apollo API + MCP or LeadMagic API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Coresignal API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Crustdata API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Dropcontact API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/apollo.json·/api/v1/tools/leadmagic.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/apollo-vs-leadmagic.md