Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run

Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP

Enrich Layer API + MCP has a score of 56 (C) against Prospeo API + MCP's 51.1 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is reliability, 30 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for

  • reliability (+30)
  • schema & documentation (+15)
  • transparency & trust (+16)

Pick Prospeo API + MCP for

  • agent ergonomics (+11)
  • security & auth (+14)
  • maintenance & community (+8)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runEnrich Layer API + MCPProspeo API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206535Enrich Layer API + MCP +30
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27661Enrich Layer API + MCP +15
Agent ergonomics13%16.26879Prospeo API + MCP +11
Security & auth14%17.54054Prospeo API + MCP +14
Payments & pricing10%12.54040even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82634Prospeo API + MCP +8
Transparency & trust7%8.86145Enrich Layer API + MCP +16
Negative events≤1500
Total56 · C51.1 · D

Facts side by side

FactEnrich Layer API + MCPProspeo API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorEnrich LayerProspeo
Hosted endpointhttps://enrichlayer.com/api/v2https://api.prospeo.io
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITMIT
Tools exposed258
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrynot listedio.prospeo/prospeo-mcp-server
Last release2026-06-192026-06-01
Popularity0 stars, 26 npm/wk0 stars, 641 npm/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Enrich Layer API + MCP

Pay-as-you-go credits from $10, non-expiring unless idle for 18 months. Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses.

Prospeo API + MCP

MCP tool descriptions say when to use each tool, its credit cost and the next call. No status page, SLA or changelog.

Before you call either

Enrich Layer API + MCP

  1. Top up once before testing. Trial keys run at 2 requests a minute
  2. Set the person profile timeout to at least 100 seconds
  3. Ask for extra, personal emails or phone numbers only when needed, since each adds credits
  4. Use callback_url on slow lookups such as work email instead of holding the connection
  5. Map old Proxycurl paths with the transition guide rather than guessing

Prospeo API + MCP

  1. Call search_suggestions before using location, technology or industry filters, or the search returns nothing
  2. Pass person_id values from search into bulk_enrich_person, 25 at a time
  3. Branch on the body error_code, not the HTTP status, which is 400 for most failures
  4. Set enrich_mobile only when needed. A mobile costs 10 credits against 1 for an email
  5. Use Enrich Person. The old Email Finder endpoint was removed in March 2026

Other comparisons with Enrich Layer API + MCP or Prospeo API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.