Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
Enrich Layer API + MCP has a score of 56 (C) against Prospeo API + MCP's 51.1 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is reliability, 30 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for
- reliability (+30)
- schema & documentation (+15)
- transparency & trust (+16)
Pick Prospeo API + MCP for
- agent ergonomics (+11)
- security & auth (+14)
- maintenance & community (+8)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Prospeo API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 35 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 61 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 79 | Prospeo API + MCP +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 54 | Prospeo API + MCP +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 26 | 34 | Prospeo API + MCP +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 45 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 56 · C | 51.1 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Prospeo API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Enrich Layer | Prospeo |
| Hosted endpoint | https://enrichlayer.com/api/v2 | https://api.prospeo.io |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 25 | 8 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.prospeo/prospeo-mcp-server |
| Last release | 2026-06-19 | 2026-06-01 |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 26 npm/wk | 0 stars, 641 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Enrich Layer API + MCP
Pay-as-you-go credits from $10, non-expiring unless idle for 18 months. Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses.
Prospeo API + MCP
MCP tool descriptions say when to use each tool, its credit cost and the next call. No status page, SLA or changelog.
Before you call either
Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Top up once before testing. Trial keys run at 2 requests a minute
- Set the person profile timeout to at least 100 seconds
- Ask for
extra, personal emails or phone numbers only when needed, since each adds credits - Use
callback_urlon slow lookups such as work email instead of holding the connection - Map old Proxycurl paths with the transition guide rather than guessing
Prospeo API + MCP
- Call
search_suggestionsbefore using location, technology or industry filters, or the search returns nothing - Pass
person_idvalues from search intobulk_enrich_person, 25 at a time - Branch on the body
error_code, not the HTTP status, which is 400 for most failures - Set
enrich_mobileonly when needed. A mobile costs 10 credits against 1 for an email - Use Enrich Person. The old Email Finder endpoint was removed in March 2026
Other comparisons with Enrich Layer API + MCP or Prospeo API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/enrich-layer.json·/api/v1/tools/prospeo.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/enrich-layer-vs-prospeo.md