Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Gojiberry
Enrich Layer API + MCP scores 55.8 (C) on agent readiness against Gojiberry's 47.9 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Gojiberry leads on reliability. Both do lead search.
Which one, for what
Good for Teams migrating Proxycurl code or doing per-profile lookups at low unit cost without a subscription.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 76 against 61
- Agent ergonomics, 68 against 55
- Security & auth, 40 against 32
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 10
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses
Good for A founder or small sales team that wants an agent to pull scored, signal-based B2B leads and run LinkedIn and email outreach from one paid workspace.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 74 against 65
Watch for
API keys carry no scopes or read-only mode, and an organisation owner's key can act as any member through x-impersonate-user-id
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Gojiberry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 74 | Gojiberry +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 61 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 55 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 32 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 10 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 26 | 25 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 58 | 59 | Gojiberry +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.8 · C | 47.9 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Gojiberry |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Enrich Layer | SUPERFRUITS SAS (Gojiberry AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://enrichlayer.com/api/v2 | https://ext.gojiberry.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under Gojiberry's General Terms |
| Tools exposed | 25 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-06-19 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2025-06-09 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-06-09 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 26 npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Enrich Layer API + MCP
Pay-as-you-go credits from $10, non-expiring unless idle for 18 months. Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses.
Gojiberry
A public OpenAPI file with 49 operations, a free masked lead search and a published limit of 100 requests a minute make the API easy to plan against. Keys have no scopes, writes can start LinkedIn outreach from a connected account, and LinkedIn's User Agreement bars the scraping and automated messaging the product depends on.
Before you call either
Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Top up once before testing. Trial keys run at 2 requests a minute
- Set the person profile timeout to at least 100 seconds
- Ask for
extra, personal emails or phone numbers only when needed, since each adds credits - Use
callback_urlon slow lookups such as work email instead of holding the connection - Map old Proxycurl paths with the transition guide rather than guessing
Gojiberry
- Send
Authorization: Bearer <key>to https://mcp.gojiberry.ai. The value must start with the word Bearer or the connection fails - Create resources in the order list, source agent, campaign. A source agent with no campaign only finds leads
- Adding a contact to a list enrols it in the linked campaign, which sends LinkedIn or email messages. Ask the user before list writes
- Search with POST /v1/directory/leads/search for free, then reveal only the ids you need at 0.5 credit each, up to 100 a request
- Use the
/enrich/email/asyncand/enrich/phone/asyncroutes and poll GET /v1/contact/{id}. The synchronous routes can take minutes
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Enrich Layer API + MCP or Gojiberry?
Enrich Layer API + MCP scores 55.8 (C) on agent readiness against Gojiberry's 47.9 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Gojiberry leads on reliability.
Do Enrich Layer API + MCP and Gojiberry need an API key?
Enrich Layer API + MCP needs an API key. Gojiberry takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Enrich Layer API + MCP and Gojiberry without installing anything?
Yes. Enrich Layer API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://enrichlayer.com/api/v2 and Gojiberry at https://ext.gojiberry.ai.
Other comparisons with Enrich Layer API + MCP or Gojiberry
- Apollo API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Fuse MCP vs Gojiberry
- Gojiberry vs Hunter API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs Lusha API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Gojiberry
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/enrich-layer-vs-gojiberry.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/enrich-layer.json·/api/v1/tools/gojiberry.json - From a terminal
anchor compare enrich-layer gojiberry(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "enrich-layer", "b": "gojiberry"}at/mcp, no key