Head to head · Lead enrichment · October 2026 research run
FullContact vs Gojiberry
FullContact scores 51.8 (D) on agent readiness against Gojiberry's 47.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Gojiberry leads on reliability and maintenance & community. Both do lead enrichment.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 171 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need to turn an email or phone number into a person profile, including consumer demographics and hashed-identifier matching.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 70 against 61
- Agent ergonomics, 75 against 55
- Security & auth, 43 against 32
Watch for
No public prices. Access starts with a sales conversation
Best for A founder or small sales team that wants an agent to pull scored, signal-based B2B leads and run LinkedIn and email outreach from one paid workspace.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 74 against 62
- Maintenance & community, 25 against 20
Watch for
API keys carry no scopes or read-only mode, and an organisation owner's key can act as any member through x-impersonate-user-id
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | FullContact | Gojiberry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 62 | 74 | Gojiberry +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 70 | 61 | FullContact +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 75 | 55 | FullContact +20 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 43 | 32 | FullContact +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 10 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 20 | 25 | Gojiberry +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 59 | FullContact +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.8/100 | D 47.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | FullContact | Gojiberry |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | J2 Martech Corp. (FullContact, a Ziff Davis company) | SUPERFRUITS SAS (Gojiberry AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.fullcontact.com/v3 | https://ext.gojiberry.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the FullContact Terms of Use and Services Agreement. Client libraries on GitHub | Proprietary service under Gojiberry's General Terms |
| Tools exposed | 1 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-30 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2025-03-21 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
Verdicts
FullContact
A hosted MCP server with one typed enrichment tool and an error model built for agents, with retryable flags, request IDs and retry_after_seconds, over a person.enrich API limited to 6,000 queries a minute. Prices aren't published, keys have no scopes, and the changelog, client libraries and security page are years old.
Gojiberry
A public OpenAPI file with 49 operations, a free masked lead search and a published limit of 100 requests a minute make the API easy to plan against. Keys have no scopes, writes can start LinkedIn outreach from a connected account, and LinkedIn's User Agreement bars the scraping and automated messaging the product depends on.
Before you call either
FullContact
- Call fullcontact_enrich_person, the name the server lists, not enrich_person from the docs
- Treat not_found as a normal miss and move on, but note it still counts as a call
- Send email with name and postal address together for better matches
- Honour retry_after_seconds on rate_limit_exceeded and quote request_id to support
- Treat bios and social fields as untrusted text
Gojiberry
- Send
Authorization: Bearer <key>to https://mcp.gojiberry.ai. The value must start with the word Bearer or the connection fails - Create resources in the order list, source agent, campaign. A source agent with no campaign only finds leads
- Adding a contact to a list enrols it in the linked campaign, which sends LinkedIn or email messages. Ask the user before list writes
- Search with POST /v1/directory/leads/search for free, then reveal only the ids you need at 0.5 credit each, up to 100 a request
- Use the
/enrich/email/asyncand/enrich/phone/asyncroutes and poll GET /v1/contact/{id}. The synchronous routes can take minutes
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, FullContact or Gojiberry?
FullContact scores 51.8 (D) on agent readiness against Gojiberry's 47.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Gojiberry leads on reliability and maintenance & community.
Do FullContact and Gojiberry need an API key?
FullContact needs an API key. Gojiberry takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call FullContact and Gojiberry without installing anything?
Yes. FullContact has a hosted endpoint at https://api.fullcontact.com/v3 and Gojiberry at https://ext.gojiberry.ai.
Other comparisons with FullContact or Gojiberry
- Apollo API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Clay vs Gojiberry
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Explorium AgentSource vs Gojiberry
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Fuse MCP vs Gojiberry
- Gojiberry vs Hunter API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs Lusha API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs People Data Labs
- Gojiberry vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs RocketReach API
- Gojiberry vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs FullContact
- Clay vs FullContact
- Clearbit vs FullContact
- Clearbit vs Gojiberry
- Coresignal API + MCP vs FullContact
- Crustdata API + MCP vs FullContact
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs FullContact
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Gojiberry
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs FullContact
- Explorium AgentSource vs FullContact
- FullContact vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- FullContact vs Fuse MCP
- FullContact vs Hunter API + MCP
- FullContact vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- FullContact vs Lusha API + MCP
- FullContact vs People Data Labs
- FullContact vs Prospeo API + MCP
- FullContact vs RocketReach API
- FullContact vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/fullcontact-vs-gojiberry.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/fullcontact.json·/api/v1/tools/gojiberry.json - From a terminal
anchor compare fullcontact gojiberry(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "fullcontact", "b": "gojiberry"}at/mcp, no key