# Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP (slim)

> LeadMagic API + MCP has a score of 60.5 (C) against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 56 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 39 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-leadmagic.md (~1,600 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-leadmagic.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-leadmagic
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

LeadMagic API + MCP has a score of 60.5 (C) against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 56 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 39 points.

- Enrich Layer API + MCP: C 56, rank #309 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/enrich-layer.min.md
- LeadMagic API + MCP: C 60.5, rank #247 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/leadmagic.min.md
- Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for reliability (+10), agent ergonomics (+7), payments & pricing (+20). Pick LeadMagic API + MCP for schema & documentation (+17), security & auth (+20), maintenance & community (+39), transparency & trust (+5).

| Category | Enrich Layer API + MCP | LeadMagic API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 55 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 76 | 93 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 68 | 61 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 40 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 26 | 65 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 61 | 66 |