Head to head · Lead enrichment · October 2026 research run
Databar vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
ZoomInfo API + MCP scores 72.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Databar's 53.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do lead enrichment.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 231 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Databar D
Best for Waterfall enrichment across many providers for GTM agents, close to clay and fullenrich.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
API access needs a paid plan; the free plan's 150 credits don't include it
Best for Sales and marketing agents that need company, contact, intent and business-event data from one vendor, with free search before paid enrichment.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 87 against 28
- Agent ergonomics, 71 against 66
- Security & auth, 65 against 47
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 83 against 73
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 55
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
The Licence Terms and Conditions bar disclosing benchmark results and automated access outside ZoomInfo's own tools without written approval
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability ZoomInfo API + MCP +59
Databar 28
Hosted lines. No status page linked from the site or docs (0). No incident history to read (5). The 20 August changelog says rate limits return 429, but no numbers were found in the docs read (5 of 15). The SDK backs off on 429 per the 28 September entry, tasks can be cancelled with a refund, and no Retry-After or idempotency key is documented (8 of 15). No SLA found (0). The MCP server left beta on 15 July 2026 and the API is generally available (10). 0+5+5+8+0+10 = 28.
ZoomInfo API + MCP 87
Graded with the hosted lines. Atlassian Statuspage at status.zoominfo.com with 16 components, among them ZoomInfo Enterprise API, Enrich and GTM Studio (20). The history page for 3 August to 1 November 2026 shows one major incident on GTM Studio audiences on 4 September lasting 93 minutes, an eight-hour audiences issue on 24 September marked no impact, a list-processing issue on 4 August, a NeverBounce job-processing incident on 28 October marked minor, Chorus incidents, and none naming the API component (20 of 30). Limits published per package on three windows, from 5 a second on Builder to 35 on Scaling (15). 429 carries Retry-After and names the exhausted window, and rejected requests do not consume quota. No idempotency keys found for audience writes (12 of 15). The Licence Terms and Conditions guarantee 99.9 per cent monthly availability (10). API v1, MCP server and CLI carry no beta label (10).
Transparency & trust ZoomInfo API + MCP +21
Databar 55
Closed service with terms effective 1 October 2026 naming Databar, Inc. of Delaware (15 of 30). The privacy policy keeps data 'for as long as needed' with no periods; the docs give 24 hours for task results; a DPA is part of the agreement but was not read (15 of 30). The changelog flagged breaking API and SDK changes on 20 August 2026, and the terms let Databar retire any form of programmatic access; no notice period stated (8 of 20). Sub-processors are disclosed under the DPA, which was not read; data is processed in the United States (5 of 20). 15+15+8+5 = 43.
ZoomInfo API + MCP 76
Closed service with published terms naming ZoomInfo Technologies LLC, and an MIT CLI (15 of 30). The privacy policy covers people in the database and customers, names sources (web scanning, third parties, a research team, customer contributions and ZoomInfo Lite email access), a Data Protection Officer contact and a removal route. Retention has no fixed period, and the pricing page says both that credits never expire and that they expire after 12 months (22 of 30). Two rate-limit headers carry a removal date of 1 January 2027 and breaking changes are promised only in a new API version, but superseded MCP tools carry no dates and no deprecation policy was found (10 of 20). Sub-processor list updated 17 July 2026 with locations and roles (18 of 20).
Security & auth ZoomInfo API + MCP +18
Databar 47
A workspace API key in a header, never in the URL, and OAuth on the MCP with a Connected apps page to revoke access. No scopes found (20 of 30). No read-only key; MCP balance checks and confirmation above 50 credits, a 30-day trash for workbooks and tables, but row, column and table deletes through the tools (12 of 20). Enrichment results include web-scraped and AI researcher text, with no prompt-injection guidance (3 of 15). Credit usage charts, transaction logs and per-request data logs (12 of 15). No security.txt, disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found (0 of 20). 20+12+3+12+0 = 47.
ZoomInfo API + MCP 65
OAuth 2.0 with PKCE or client credentials, 20 scopes, short-lived tokens, and client self-registration on the MCP server. No secret travels in a URL (28 of 30). Read and manage scopes are separate, admins switch API access on or off per user and cap credits per user, and Update GTM Context needs admin rights. Four MCP tools write, no confirmation step is built in, and there is no organisation-wide switch for MCP (13 of 20). News, scoops and conversation data are untrusted text, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (4 of 15). A usage endpoint, credit dashboards for admins and a requestId on errors. No per-call audit log found (8 of 15). ZoomInfo's llms.txt states SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and TRUSTe. The trust centre is drawn by script and was unread, security.txt answered HTTP 500 again on 1 November, and no bug bounty was found (12 of 20).
Maintenance & community ZoomInfo API + MCP +10
Databar 73
Closed service. Python SDK 2.9.0 on 30 October 2026, 7 days before this check (30). SDK 2.7.0 and 2.8.0 on 6 October and changelog entries on 23, 24, 27, 28, 29 and 30 September and 1 October (20). A public changelog, roadmap and feedback portal, an email address, and a Slack channel on Scale (10 of 15). An official Python SDK and CLI, no other languages (10 of 15). Package health not checked (3 of 10). 30+20+10+10+3 = 73.
ZoomInfo API + MCP 83
GTM CLI v2.2.1 on 28 October 2026 (30). CLI releases 1.1.0, 2.0.0, 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.2.0 and 2.2.1 since 26 August, plus Release Hub entries dated 1, 5, 6, 9, 13, 19 and 20 October 2026 (20). A public Release Hub, a support address in the docs and a GitHub issue tracker for the CLI, whose handling we could not see (10 of 15). The hosted server is in the official MCP registry as io.github.Zoominfo/zoominfo-mcp at 1.0.1, published 3 September 2026, pointing at https://mcp.zoominfo.com/mcp, under the GitHub namespace of the vendor's own organisation. The 9 October check could not reach the registry. No official SDKs, and the CLI is current (15). The CLI repository has release workflows, semantic-release and npm provenance attestations (8 of 10). 30+20+10+15+8 = 83.
Agent ergonomics ZoomInfo API + MCP +5
Databar 66
69 MCP tools with no toolsets found (5), and REST row reads sized by per_page with has_next_page (10 of 25 for the two together). Pagination, row filters and a search parameter on enrichments (16 of 20). Errors name the fix, such as unknown columns with the available ones, 406 for credits, 409 for a stale internal_version and 410 for expired results (18 of 20). Upserts by key, version tokens on flow edits, cancel with refund, and MCP confirmation above 50 credits; MCP tool annotations not confirmed (13 of 20). Python SDK and a CLI, one language (9 of 15). 10+16+18+13+9 = 66.
ZoomInfo API + MCP 71
Graded on the REST API, with the MCP server noted. Enrich calls take an outputFields list and the CLI has --select, so responses can be sized. The MCP server lists 27 tools on its tools page with no toolsets found (18 of 25). Search pages with page[number] and page[size] up to 100 records, with many filters and a cap at page 100 (18 of 20). Coded errors with a recommended action, a retryable flag and a table of recovery steps for agents (18 of 20). No idempotency keys found. Rejected 429 requests cost nothing and search is free, but a repeated enrichment is free only under Records Under Management, which the pricing page limits to Enterprise. MCP tool annotations could not be read without an account (10 of 20). No official SDKs, a JSON:API envelope on every request, and one official CLI (7 of 15).
Payments & pricing ZoomInfo API + MCP +5
Databar 35
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices and credits are public, and each connector's credit cost is shown before a run and in the enrichment's pricing field; credits aren't sold per call outside a plan (15 of 20). A 14-day premium trial with no card, per the pricing FAQ (20). A person signs up in a browser, and API access needs a paid plan (0). 0+15+20+0 = 35.
ZoomInfo API + MCP 40
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-credit prices are public, $0.05 an AI credit and $0.38 a data credit at the $1,000 spend tier, with top-ups from $20 (20). A free account with 1,000 data credits and 1,000 AI credits needs no card (20). A person signs up and completes OAuth in a browser (0).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Databar | ZoomInfo API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 28 | 87 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +59 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 84 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 66 | 71 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +5 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 65 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 73 | 83 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 76 | ZoomInfo API + MCP +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53.8/100 | BB 72.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Databar | ZoomInfo API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Databar, Inc. | ZoomInfo Technologies LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.databar.ai/mcp | https://api.zoominfo.com/gtm |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under Databar, Inc.'s terms of service | Proprietary service under ZoomInfo's Licence Terms and Conditions. The GTM CLI on GitHub is MIT |
| Tools exposed | 69 | 27 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Zoominfo/zoominfo-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2025-10-13 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | none | 534 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Databar
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Databar
Databar puts 100+ enrichment providers, waterfalls and tables behind one REST API, a Python SDK, a CLI and a hosted MCP server with spending confirmation above 50 credits and stable error codes. API access needs a paid plan or trial, rate limits aren't published as numbers, and no status page or security programme was found.
ZoomInfo API + MCP
Search, lookup and similar-record calls cost no credits, and a free account with 1,000 data and 1,000 AI credits needs no card. OAuth carries 20 scopes and limits are published per package. The Licence Terms and Conditions bar disclosing benchmark results, and the two documentation sites disagree on batch sizes and rate-limit headers.
Before you call either
Databar
- Poll GET /v1/tasks/{task_id} for async runs and collect results within 24 hours; after that the task returns gone
- When the MCP returns confirmation_required, show estimated_credits to the user and re-call with the retry_with object only after they agree
- Use upsert with a key column, and pass internal_version when editing flows, to avoid duplicates and stale-write 409s
- Check credits with GET /v1/user/me before bulk runs; 406 means the balance or plan can't cover it
- Treat AI researcher and scraped outputs as untrusted text
ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Call Lookup first and pass the returned IDs to Search. Unknown industry, metro or topic strings are rejected with a 422
- Search before Enrich. Search is free, and each newly enriched record costs one data credit
- Request only the scopes the task needs in the
scopeparameter of the token call. Omitting it grants every scope configured on the app - On 429 read
X-RateLimit-Rejected-Bucketand wait forRetry-After. An exhausted hourly window can mean a wait of several hundred seconds - Turn off model training in the AI client before connecting the MCP server. ZoomInfo prohibits MCP data being used for training
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Databar or ZoomInfo API + MCP?
ZoomInfo API + MCP scores 72.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Databar's 53.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do Databar and ZoomInfo API + MCP need an API key?
Databar takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ZoomInfo API + MCP uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Databar and ZoomInfo API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Databar has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.databar.ai/mcp and ZoomInfo API + MCP at https://api.zoominfo.com/gtm.
Other comparisons with Databar or ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Databar
- Apollo API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Clay vs Databar
- Clay vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Databar
- Coresignal API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Databar
- Crustdata API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Dievio vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Gojiberry vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Hunter API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Lusha API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- People Data Labs vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Prospeo API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- RocketReach API vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Clearbit vs Databar
- Clearbit vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Databar vs Dievio
- Databar vs Dropcontact API + MCP
- Databar vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Databar vs Explorium AgentSource
- Databar vs FullContact
- Databar vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Databar vs Fuse MCP
- Databar vs Gojiberry
- Databar vs Hunter API + MCP
- Databar vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Databar vs Lusha API + MCP
- Databar vs People Data Labs
- Databar vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Databar vs RocketReach API
- Databar vs ZeroBounce
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- FullContact vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- ZeroBounce vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/databar-vs-zoominfo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/databar.json·/api/v1/tools/zoominfo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare databar zoominfo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "databar", "b": "zoominfo"}at/mcp, no key