Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Pushary vs Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev has a score of 74.8 (BB) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 55 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Pushary for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick Trigger.dev for
- reliability (+55)
- schema & documentation (+18)
- security & auth (+9)
- payments & pricing (+30)
- maintenance & community (+30)
- transparency & trust (+11)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Pushary | Trigger.dev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 75 | Trigger.dev +55 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 73 | 91 | Trigger.dev +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 79 | Trigger.dev +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 73 | Trigger.dev +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 40 | Trigger.dev +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 90 | Trigger.dev +30 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 74 | Trigger.dev +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 51.4 · D | 74.8 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Pushary | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | Model platform |
| Vendor | Pushary | Trigger.dev |
| Hosted endpoint | https://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp | https://api.trigger.dev |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (skill, hooks and adapters) | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 6 | 31 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.Pushary/pushary | io.github.triggerdotdev/trigger.dev |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.6/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Pushary
Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.
Trigger.dev
Tokens complete from a backend, a pre-signed callback URL or the browser with a token scoped to one waitpoint. 10-minute default timeout on tokens.
Before you call either
Pushary
- Read
answered,statusandhandoffActionon every result, and never treat a timeout as approval - Expect
ask_userto return at once withanswered: falsewhen the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only - Poll
wait_for_answeronce (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping - Cancel a live question with
cancel_questionbefore asking the same thing in chat - Group open decisions into one
selectquestion, since each push interrupts the user
Trigger.dev
- Pass an explicit
timeouttowait.createToken()and handleok: falseas a timeout - Use an idempotency key when creating the token so a retried step doesn't send the reviewer a second request
- Give the browser the
publicAccessToken, never the secret key, and don't calltoken.urlfrom client code - Tag tokens with the user or task ID so pending approvals can be listed per reviewer
- Start the MCP server with
--readonlywhen the agent only needs to inspect runs
Other comparisons with Pushary or Trigger.dev
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/pushary.json·/api/v1/tools/trigger-dev.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/pushary-vs-trigger-dev.md