Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Pushary vs Trigger.dev

Trigger.dev has a score of 74.8 (BB) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 55 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Pushary for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Trigger.dev for

  • reliability (+55)
  • schema & documentation (+18)
  • security & auth (+9)
  • payments & pricing (+30)
  • maintenance & community (+30)
  • transparency & trust (+11)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPusharyTrigger.devEdge
Reliability16%202075Trigger.dev +55
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27391Trigger.dev +18
Agent ergonomics13%16.27679Trigger.dev +3
Security & auth14%17.56473Trigger.dev +9
Payments & pricing10%12.51040Trigger.dev +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86090Trigger.dev +30
Transparency & trust7%8.86374Trigger.dev +11
Negative events≤1500
Total51.4 · D74.8 · BB

Facts side by side

FactPusharyTrigger.dev
KindMCP serverModel platform
VendorPusharyTrigger.dev
Hosted endpointhttps://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcphttps://api.trigger.dev
TransportsStreamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)HTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMIT (skill, hooks and adapters)Apache-2.0
Tools exposed631
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registryio.github.Pushary/pusharyio.github.triggerdotdev/trigger.dev
Last release2026-10-012026-10-01
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Pushary

Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.

Trigger.dev

Tokens complete from a backend, a pre-signed callback URL or the browser with a token scoped to one waitpoint. 10-minute default timeout on tokens.

Before you call either

Pushary

  1. Read answered, status and handoffAction on every result, and never treat a timeout as approval
  2. Expect ask_user to return at once with answered: false when the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only
  3. Poll wait_for_answer once (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping
  4. Cancel a live question with cancel_question before asking the same thing in chat
  5. Group open decisions into one select question, since each push interrupts the user

Trigger.dev

  1. Pass an explicit timeout to wait.createToken() and handle ok: false as a timeout
  2. Use an idempotency key when creating the token so a retried step doesn't send the reviewer a second request
  3. Give the browser the publicAccessToken, never the secret key, and don't call token.url from client code
  4. Tag tokens with the user or task ID so pending approvals can be listed per reviewer
  5. Start the MCP server with --readonly when the agent only needs to inspect runs

Other comparisons with Pushary or Trigger.dev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.