Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Inngest vs Pushary
Inngest has a score of 66.3 (B) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 37 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Inngest for
- reliability (+37)
- schema & documentation (+16)
- payments & pricing (+30)
- maintenance & community (+28)
Pick Pushary for
- transparency & trust (+7)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inngest | Pushary | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 57 | 20 | Inngest +37 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 73 | Inngest +16 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 76 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 64 | Pushary +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 10 | Inngest +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 88 | 60 | Inngest +28 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 63 | Pushary +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.3 · B | 51.4 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inngest | Pushary |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | MCP server |
| Vendor | Inngest | Pushary |
| Hosted endpoint | https://inn.gs/e/ | https://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | SSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 (server), Apache-2.0 (SDKs) | MIT (skill, hooks and adapters) |
| Tools exposed | none | 6 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Pushary/pushary |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Inngest
Waits are durable and cost nothing while suspended, with runs up to 30 days on Free and 366 on Business. No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email, so the human side is your code.
Pushary
Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.
Before you call either
Inngest
- Use
step.waitForSignal()when one run waits for one answer, andwaitForEventonly when one answer resumes many runs - Register the wait before you send the approval request, or check the external state first, since early events are missed
- Use a unique approval ID per tool call and
matchon it, so parallel approvals resolve independently - Treat
nullorundefinedas a timeout and decide on purpose whether that rejects, approves or escalates - Set an event
idwhen sending the answer, so a retried send is dropped within 24 hours
Pushary
- Read
answered,statusandhandoffActionon every result, and never treat a timeout as approval - Expect
ask_userto return at once withanswered: falsewhen the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only - Poll
wait_for_answeronce (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping - Cancel a live question with
cancel_questionbefore asking the same thing in chat - Group open decisions into one
selectquestion, since each push interrupts the user
Other comparisons with Inngest or Pushary
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/inngest.json·/api/v1/tools/pushary.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/inngest-vs-pushary.md