Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

gotoHuman vs Inngest

Inngest has a score of 66.3 (B) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 40 points.

Which one, for what

Pick gotoHuman for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Inngest for

  • reliability (+37)
  • schema & documentation (+40)
  • agent ergonomics (+14)
  • security & auth (+16)
  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • maintenance & community (+24)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this rungotoHumanInngestEdge
Reliability16%202057Inngest +37
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24989Inngest +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.26276Inngest +14
Security & auth14%17.54460Inngest +16
Payments & pricing10%12.53040Inngest +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86488Inngest +24
Transparency & trust7%8.85556Inngest +1
Negative events≤1500
Total43.9 · E66.3 · B

Facts side by side

FactgotoHumanInngest
KindHTTP APIModel platform
VendorgotoHumanInngest
Hosted endpointhttps://api.gotohuman.comhttps://inn.gs/e/
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDKs and MCP server)SSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 (server), Apache-2.0 (SDKs)
Tools exposed3none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-242026-09-22
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

gotoHuman

Built for agent review, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, a 3-tool MCP server, an n8n node and a Make app. No status page, published rate limits or documented error responses.

Inngest

Waits are durable and cost nothing while suspended, with runs up to 30 days on Free and 366 on Business. No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email, so the human side is your code.

Before you call either

gotoHuman

  1. Call get-form-schema before request-human-review-with-form, since the field data must match the review type
  2. Send agentId on every API request, because the API reference marks it required even though the JS SDK doesn't
  3. Pass a webhookUrl per request when the review type has no default, or the answer has nowhere to go
  4. Deduplicate webhook calls on the Idempotency-Key header, since delivery is at least once
  5. Set your own deadline on the agent side and treat silence as a rejection

Inngest

  1. Use step.waitForSignal() when one run waits for one answer, and waitForEvent only when one answer resumes many runs
  2. Register the wait before you send the approval request, or check the external state first, since early events are missed
  3. Use a unique approval ID per tool call and match on it, so parallel approvals resolve independently
  4. Treat null or undefined as a timeout and decide on purpose whether that rejects, approves or escalates
  5. Set an event id when sending the answer, so a retried send is dropped within 24 hours

Other comparisons with gotoHuman or Inngest

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.