Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Inngest vs Trigger.dev

Trigger.dev has a score of 74.8 (BB) against Inngest's 66.3 (B). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 18 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Inngest for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Trigger.dev for

  • reliability (+18)
  • security & auth (+13)
  • transparency & trust (+18)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runInngestTrigger.devEdge
Reliability16%205775Trigger.dev +18
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28991Trigger.dev +2
Agent ergonomics13%16.27679Trigger.dev +3
Security & auth14%17.56073Trigger.dev +13
Payments & pricing10%12.54040even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88890Trigger.dev +2
Transparency & trust7%8.85674Trigger.dev +18
Negative events≤1500
Total66.3 · B74.8 · BB

Facts side by side

FactInngestTrigger.dev
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorInngestTrigger.dev
Hosted endpointhttps://inn.gs/e/https://api.trigger.dev
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceSSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 (server), Apache-2.0 (SDKs)Apache-2.0
Tools exposednone31
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listedio.github.triggerdotdev/trigger.dev
Last release2026-09-222026-10-01
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Inngest

Waits are durable and cost nothing while suspended, with runs up to 30 days on Free and 366 on Business. No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email, so the human side is your code.

Trigger.dev

Tokens complete from a backend, a pre-signed callback URL or the browser with a token scoped to one waitpoint. 10-minute default timeout on tokens.

Before you call either

Inngest

  1. Use step.waitForSignal() when one run waits for one answer, and waitForEvent only when one answer resumes many runs
  2. Register the wait before you send the approval request, or check the external state first, since early events are missed
  3. Use a unique approval ID per tool call and match on it, so parallel approvals resolve independently
  4. Treat null or undefined as a timeout and decide on purpose whether that rejects, approves or escalates
  5. Set an event id when sending the answer, so a retried send is dropped within 24 hours

Trigger.dev

  1. Pass an explicit timeout to wait.createToken() and handle ok: false as a timeout
  2. Use an idempotency key when creating the token so a retried step doesn't send the reviewer a second request
  3. Give the browser the publicAccessToken, never the secret key, and don't call token.url from client code
  4. Tag tokens with the user or task ID so pending approvals can be listed per reviewer
  5. Start the MCP server with --readonly when the agent only needs to inspect runs

Other comparisons with Inngest or Trigger.dev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.