Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev has a score of 74.8 (BB) against Orkes Conductor Human tasks's 54.2 (C). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 43 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Orkes Conductor Human tasks for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick Trigger.dev for
- reliability (+43)
- schema & documentation (+26)
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- payments & pricing (+20)
- maintenance & community (+9)
- transparency & trust (+28)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Orkes Conductor Human tasks | Trigger.dev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 32 | 75 | Trigger.dev +43 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 65 | 91 | Trigger.dev +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 79 | Trigger.dev +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 71 | 73 | Trigger.dev +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 40 | Trigger.dev +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 81 | 90 | Trigger.dev +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 46 | 74 | Trigger.dev +28 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 54.2 · C | 74.8 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Orkes Conductor Human tasks | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Orkes | Trigger.dev |
| Hosted endpoint | https://developer.orkescloud.com/api | https://api.trigger.dev |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (Conductor OSS and SDKs), proprietary (Orkes Conductor) | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 19 | 31 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.conductor-oss/conductor-mcp | io.github.triggerdotdev/trigger.dev |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.6/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Orkes Conductor Human tasks
Escalation chains with a time limit per assignee and a choice of leaving the task open or failing the workflow. No built-in Slack or email prompt, so alerts need a trigger policy and a second workflow.
Trigger.dev
Tokens complete from a backend, a pre-signed callback URL or the browser with a token scoped to one waitpoint. 10-minute default timeout on tokens.
Before you call either
Orkes Conductor Human tasks
- Give every assignment you want to escalate from a non-zero
slaMinutes, since 0 never expires and nothing can follow it - Pick
TERMINATEfor risky actions so an unanswered approval fails the workflow instead of staying open to anyone - Start approval workflows with an
idempotencyKeyandRETURN_EXISTING, so a retried start doesn't ask twice - Refresh the JWT from
/api/tokenwith a set expiry instead of requesting one that never expires - Fetch single doc pages, not llms.txt, which is the whole documentation in 2.57 MB
Trigger.dev
- Pass an explicit
timeouttowait.createToken()and handleok: falseas a timeout - Use an idempotency key when creating the token so a retried step doesn't send the reviewer a second request
- Give the browser the
publicAccessToken, never the secret key, and don't calltoken.urlfrom client code - Tag tokens with the user or task ID so pending approvals can be listed per reviewer
- Start the MCP server with
--readonlywhen the agent only needs to inspect runs
Other comparisons with Orkes Conductor Human tasks or Trigger.dev
- gotoHuman vs Orkes Conductor Human tasks
- gotoHuman vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Orkes Conductor Human tasks
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev
- Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Permit MCP Gateway
- Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Pushary
- Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Temporal
- Permit MCP Gateway vs Trigger.dev
- Pushary vs Trigger.dev
- Temporal vs Trigger.dev