Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Temporal

Temporal has a score of 77.2 (BB) against Orkes Conductor Human tasks's 54.2 (C). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 53 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Orkes Conductor Human tasks for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Temporal for

  • reliability (+53)
  • schema & documentation (+26)
  • agent ergonomics (+16)
  • security & auth (+15)
  • maintenance & community (+9)
  • transparency & trust (+24)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runOrkes Conductor Human tasksTemporalEdge
Reliability16%203285Temporal +53
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26591Temporal +26
Agent ergonomics13%16.26985Temporal +16
Security & auth14%17.57186Temporal +15
Payments & pricing10%12.52020even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88190Temporal +9
Transparency & trust7%8.84670Temporal +24
Negative events≤1500
Total54.2 · C77.2 · BB

Facts side by side

FactOrkes Conductor Human tasksTemporal
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorOrkesTemporal Technologies
Hosted endpointhttps://developer.orkescloud.com/apino (local only)
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidPay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (Conductor OSS and SDKs), proprietary (Orkes Conductor)MIT
Tools exposed19none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.conductor-oss/conductor-mcpnot listed
Last release2026-09-102026-09-15
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Escalation chains with a time limit per assignee and a choice of leaving the task open or failing the workflow. No built-in Slack or email prompt, so alerts need a trigger policy and a second workflow.

Temporal

Waits of any length with a timeout survive worker restarts and deploys. No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code.

Before you call either

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

  1. Give every assignment you want to escalate from a non-zero slaMinutes, since 0 never expires and nothing can follow it
  2. Pick TERMINATE for risky actions so an unanswered approval fails the workflow instead of staying open to anyone
  3. Start approval workflows with an idempotencyKey and RETURN_EXISTING, so a retried start doesn't ask twice
  4. Refresh the JWT from /api/token with a set expiry instead of requesting one that never expires
  5. Fetch single doc pages, not llms.txt, which is the whole documentation in 2.57 MB

Temporal

  1. Put the decision in a typed Signal payload (approver, decision, comments, timestamp) instead of a bare boolean
  2. Always wait with a timeout and treat the timeout path as a rejection or an escalation on purpose
  3. Use the workflow ID as the approval ID, so the reviewer's tool only needs one value to send the Signal
  4. Use an Update instead of a Signal when the approver's tool needs an acknowledgement back
  5. Expect ResourceExhausted under load and let the SDK retry it, since signals are throttled last

Other comparisons with Orkes Conductor Human tasks or Temporal

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.