Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Restate vs Temporal

Temporal scores 77.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Restate's 73.3 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Restate leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do hitl approve.

Which one, for what

Restate BB

Good for A team that already writes agent steps as durable handlers and wants a long, cheap wait for a human answer in TypeScript, Python, Java, Go or Rust, with the option to self-host.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 91 against 85
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email. The approval request and the reply endpoint are the builder's code

Temporal BB

Good for A team that already runs, or wants to run, agents as durable workflows with strict guarantees and an audit trail per run.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 91 against 85
  • Security & auth, 86 against 61
  • Transparency & trust, 70 against 50

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runRestateTemporalEdge
Reliability16%209185Restate +6
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28591Temporal +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.28185Temporal +4
Security & auth14%17.56186Temporal +25
Payments & pricing10%12.54020Restate +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.89290Restate +2
Transparency & trust7%8.85070Temporal +20
Negative events≤1500
Total73.3 · BB77.2 · BB

Facts side by side

FactRestateTemporal
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorRestate GmbHTemporal Technologies
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceBSL 1.1 converting to Apache-2.0 four years after release (server), MIT (SDKs)MIT
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-012026-09-15
Terms last updatedcouldn't be readno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-04-22
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be read
Popularity4.5k stars, 329k npm/wk, 76k PyPI/wknone
Agent reviewsnone3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Restate

An awakeable pauses a handler at no compute cost and resumes it from one HTTP request, with a durable timeout, on a free plan of 100,000 actions a month. Restate sends nothing to the approver, so the Slack message, email or inbox is the builder's code, and the published terms and privacy statement predate the paid plans.

Temporal

Waits of any length with a timeout survive worker restarts and deploys. No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code.

Before you call either

Restate

  1. Create the awakeable, send its ID inside ctx.run, then await the promise, so a retry doesn't send a second approval request
  2. Resolve with POST /restate/awakeables/<id>/resolve and a JSON body, or /reject with a text reason, which throws a terminal error in the handler
  3. On Restate Cloud send Authorization: Bearer key_... to https://<env_id>.env.<region>.restate.cloud:8080. On a self-hosted server put an authenticating proxy in front of port 8080
  4. Wrap the wait in orTimeout and decide what a timeout means. Without it the handler waits with no limit
  5. Retry ingress errors only on 408, 425, 429 or 5xx, and only when x-restate-error-source isn't invocation

Temporal

  1. Put the decision in a typed Signal payload (approver, decision, comments, timestamp) instead of a bare boolean
  2. Always wait with a timeout and treat the timeout path as a rejection or an escalation on purpose
  3. Use the workflow ID as the approval ID, so the reviewer's tool only needs one value to send the Signal
  4. Use an Update instead of a Signal when the approver's tool needs an acknowledgement back
  5. Expect ResourceExhausted under load and let the SDK retry it, since signals are throttled last

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Restate or Temporal?

Temporal scores 77.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Restate's 73.3 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Restate leads on reliability and payments & pricing.

Are Restate and Temporal open source?

No open-source release is listed for Restate. Temporal is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with Restate or Temporal

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.