Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Restate vs Temporal
Temporal scores 77.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Restate's 73.3 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Restate leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do hitl approve.
Which one, for what
Restate BB
Good for A team that already writes agent steps as durable handlers and wants a long, cheap wait for a human answer in TypeScript, Python, Java, Go or Rust, with the option to self-host.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 91 against 85
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 20
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email. The approval request and the reply endpoint are the builder's code
Temporal BB
Good for A team that already runs, or wants to run, agents as durable workflows with strict guarantees and an audit trail per run.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 85
- Security & auth, 86 against 61
- Transparency & trust, 70 against 50
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Restate | Temporal | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 91 | 85 | Restate +6 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 91 | Temporal +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 81 | 85 | Temporal +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 61 | 86 | Temporal +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | Restate +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 92 | 90 | Restate +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 50 | 70 | Temporal +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 73.3 · BB | 77.2 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Restate | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Restate GmbH | Temporal Technologies |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | BSL 1.1 converting to Apache-2.0 four years after release (server), MIT (SDKs) | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-15 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-04-22 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | |
| Popularity | 4.5k stars, 329k npm/wk, 76k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.6/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Restate
An awakeable pauses a handler at no compute cost and resumes it from one HTTP request, with a durable timeout, on a free plan of 100,000 actions a month. Restate sends nothing to the approver, so the Slack message, email or inbox is the builder's code, and the published terms and privacy statement predate the paid plans.
Temporal
Waits of any length with a timeout survive worker restarts and deploys. No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code.
Before you call either
Restate
- Create the awakeable, send its ID inside
ctx.run, then await the promise, so a retry doesn't send a second approval request - Resolve with
POST /restate/awakeables/<id>/resolveand a JSON body, or/rejectwith a text reason, which throws a terminal error in the handler - On Restate Cloud send
Authorization: Bearer key_...tohttps://<env_id>.env.<region>.restate.cloud:8080. On a self-hosted server put an authenticating proxy in front of port 8080 - Wrap the wait in
orTimeoutand decide what a timeout means. Without it the handler waits with no limit - Retry ingress errors only on 408, 425, 429 or 5xx, and only when
x-restate-error-sourceisn'tinvocation
Temporal
- Put the decision in a typed Signal payload (approver, decision, comments, timestamp) instead of a bare boolean
- Always wait with a timeout and treat the timeout path as a rejection or an escalation on purpose
- Use the workflow ID as the approval ID, so the reviewer's tool only needs one value to send the Signal
- Use an Update instead of a Signal when the approver's tool needs an acknowledgement back
- Expect
ResourceExhaustedunder load and let the SDK retry it, since signals are throttled last
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Restate or Temporal?
Temporal scores 77.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Restate's 73.3 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Restate leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Are Restate and Temporal open source?
No open-source release is listed for Restate. Temporal is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Restate or Temporal
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/restate-vs-temporal.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/restate.json·/api/v1/tools/temporal.json - From a terminal
anchor compare restate temporal(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "restate", "b": "temporal"}at/mcp, no key