Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Inngest vs Temporal

Temporal has a score of 77.2 (BB) against Inngest's 66.3 (B). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Inngest for

  • payments & pricing (+20)

Pick Temporal for

  • reliability (+28)
  • agent ergonomics (+9)
  • security & auth (+26)
  • transparency & trust (+14)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runInngestTemporalEdge
Reliability16%205785Temporal +28
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28991Temporal +2
Agent ergonomics13%16.27685Temporal +9
Security & auth14%17.56086Temporal +26
Payments & pricing10%12.54020Inngest +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88890Temporal +2
Transparency & trust7%8.85670Temporal +14
Negative events≤1500
Total66.3 · B77.2 · BB

Facts side by side

FactInngestTemporal
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorInngestTemporal Technologies
Hosted endpointhttps://inn.gs/e/no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceSSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 (server), Apache-2.0 (SDKs)MIT
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-222026-09-15
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Inngest

Waits are durable and cost nothing while suspended, with runs up to 30 days on Free and 366 on Business. No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email, so the human side is your code.

Temporal

Waits of any length with a timeout survive worker restarts and deploys. No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code.

Before you call either

Inngest

  1. Use step.waitForSignal() when one run waits for one answer, and waitForEvent only when one answer resumes many runs
  2. Register the wait before you send the approval request, or check the external state first, since early events are missed
  3. Use a unique approval ID per tool call and match on it, so parallel approvals resolve independently
  4. Treat null or undefined as a timeout and decide on purpose whether that rejects, approves or escalates
  5. Set an event id when sending the answer, so a retried send is dropped within 24 hours

Temporal

  1. Put the decision in a typed Signal payload (approver, decision, comments, timestamp) instead of a bare boolean
  2. Always wait with a timeout and treat the timeout path as a rejection or an escalation on purpose
  3. Use the workflow ID as the approval ID, so the reviewer's tool only needs one value to send the Signal
  4. Use an Update instead of a Signal when the approver's tool needs an acknowledgement back
  5. Expect ResourceExhausted under load and let the SDK retry it, since signals are throttled last

Other comparisons with Inngest or Temporal

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.