Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Inngest vs Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Inngest has a score of 66.3 (B) against Orkes Conductor Human tasks's 54.2 (C). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 25 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Inngest for

  • reliability (+25)
  • schema & documentation (+24)
  • agent ergonomics (+7)
  • payments & pricing (+20)
  • maintenance & community (+7)
  • transparency & trust (+10)

Pick Orkes Conductor Human tasks for

  • security & auth (+11)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runInngestOrkes Conductor Human tasksEdge
Reliability16%205732Inngest +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28965Inngest +24
Agent ergonomics13%16.27669Inngest +7
Security & auth14%17.56071Orkes Conductor Human tasks +11
Payments & pricing10%12.54020Inngest +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88881Inngest +7
Transparency & trust7%8.85646Inngest +10
Negative events≤1500
Total66.3 · B54.2 · C

Facts side by side

FactInngestOrkes Conductor Human tasks
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorInngestOrkes
Hosted endpointhttps://inn.gs/e/https://developer.orkescloud.com/api
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceSSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 (server), Apache-2.0 (SDKs)Apache-2.0 (Conductor OSS and SDKs), proprietary (Orkes Conductor)
Tools exposednone19
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listedio.github.conductor-oss/conductor-mcp
Last release2026-09-222026-09-10
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Inngest

Waits are durable and cost nothing while suspended, with runs up to 30 days on Free and 366 on Business. No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email, so the human side is your code.

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Escalation chains with a time limit per assignee and a choice of leaving the task open or failing the workflow. No built-in Slack or email prompt, so alerts need a trigger policy and a second workflow.

Before you call either

Inngest

  1. Use step.waitForSignal() when one run waits for one answer, and waitForEvent only when one answer resumes many runs
  2. Register the wait before you send the approval request, or check the external state first, since early events are missed
  3. Use a unique approval ID per tool call and match on it, so parallel approvals resolve independently
  4. Treat null or undefined as a timeout and decide on purpose whether that rejects, approves or escalates
  5. Set an event id when sending the answer, so a retried send is dropped within 24 hours

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

  1. Give every assignment you want to escalate from a non-zero slaMinutes, since 0 never expires and nothing can follow it
  2. Pick TERMINATE for risky actions so an unanswered approval fails the workflow instead of staying open to anyone
  3. Start approval workflows with an idempotencyKey and RETURN_EXISTING, so a retried start doesn't ask twice
  4. Refresh the JWT from /api/token with a set expiry instead of requesting one that never expires
  5. Fetch single doc pages, not llms.txt, which is the whole documentation in 2.57 MB

Other comparisons with Inngest or Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.