Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

gotoHuman vs Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Orkes Conductor Human tasks has a score of 54.2 (C) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is security & auth, 27 points.

Which one, for what

Pick gotoHuman for

  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • transparency & trust (+9)

Pick Orkes Conductor Human tasks for

  • reliability (+12)
  • schema & documentation (+16)
  • agent ergonomics (+7)
  • security & auth (+27)
  • maintenance & community (+17)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this rungotoHumanOrkes Conductor Human tasksEdge
Reliability16%202032Orkes Conductor Human tasks +12
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24965Orkes Conductor Human tasks +16
Agent ergonomics13%16.26269Orkes Conductor Human tasks +7
Security & auth14%17.54471Orkes Conductor Human tasks +27
Payments & pricing10%12.53020gotoHuman +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86481Orkes Conductor Human tasks +17
Transparency & trust7%8.85546gotoHuman +9
Negative events≤1500
Total43.9 · E54.2 · C

Facts side by side

FactgotoHumanOrkes Conductor Human tasks
KindHTTP APIModel platform
VendorgotoHumanOrkes
Hosted endpointhttps://api.gotohuman.comhttps://developer.orkescloud.com/api
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDKs and MCP server)Apache-2.0 (Conductor OSS and SDKs), proprietary (Orkes Conductor)
Tools exposed319
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listedio.github.conductor-oss/conductor-mcp
Last release2026-09-242026-09-10
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

gotoHuman

Built for agent review, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, a 3-tool MCP server, an n8n node and a Make app. No status page, published rate limits or documented error responses.

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Escalation chains with a time limit per assignee and a choice of leaving the task open or failing the workflow. No built-in Slack or email prompt, so alerts need a trigger policy and a second workflow.

Before you call either

gotoHuman

  1. Call get-form-schema before request-human-review-with-form, since the field data must match the review type
  2. Send agentId on every API request, because the API reference marks it required even though the JS SDK doesn't
  3. Pass a webhookUrl per request when the review type has no default, or the answer has nowhere to go
  4. Deduplicate webhook calls on the Idempotency-Key header, since delivery is at least once
  5. Set your own deadline on the agent side and treat silence as a rejection

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

  1. Give every assignment you want to escalate from a non-zero slaMinutes, since 0 never expires and nothing can follow it
  2. Pick TERMINATE for risky actions so an unanswered approval fails the workflow instead of staying open to anyone
  3. Start approval workflows with an idempotencyKey and RETURN_EXISTING, so a retried start doesn't ask twice
  4. Refresh the JWT from /api/token with a set expiry instead of requesting one that never expires
  5. Fetch single doc pages, not llms.txt, which is the whole documentation in 2.57 MB

Other comparisons with gotoHuman or Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.