Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

gotoHuman vs Trigger.dev

Trigger.dev has a score of 74.8 (BB) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 55 points.

Which one, for what

Pick gotoHuman for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Trigger.dev for

  • reliability (+55)
  • schema & documentation (+42)
  • agent ergonomics (+17)
  • security & auth (+29)
  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • maintenance & community (+26)
  • transparency & trust (+19)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this rungotoHumanTrigger.devEdge
Reliability16%202075Trigger.dev +55
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24991Trigger.dev +42
Agent ergonomics13%16.26279Trigger.dev +17
Security & auth14%17.54473Trigger.dev +29
Payments & pricing10%12.53040Trigger.dev +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86490Trigger.dev +26
Transparency & trust7%8.85574Trigger.dev +19
Negative events≤1500
Total43.9 · E74.8 · BB

Facts side by side

FactgotoHumanTrigger.dev
KindHTTP APIModel platform
VendorgotoHumanTrigger.dev
Hosted endpointhttps://api.gotohuman.comhttps://api.trigger.dev
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDKs and MCP server)Apache-2.0
Tools exposed331
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listedio.github.triggerdotdev/trigger.dev
Last release2026-09-242026-10-01
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

gotoHuman

Built for agent review, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, a 3-tool MCP server, an n8n node and a Make app. No status page, published rate limits or documented error responses.

Trigger.dev

Tokens complete from a backend, a pre-signed callback URL or the browser with a token scoped to one waitpoint. 10-minute default timeout on tokens.

Before you call either

gotoHuman

  1. Call get-form-schema before request-human-review-with-form, since the field data must match the review type
  2. Send agentId on every API request, because the API reference marks it required even though the JS SDK doesn't
  3. Pass a webhookUrl per request when the review type has no default, or the answer has nowhere to go
  4. Deduplicate webhook calls on the Idempotency-Key header, since delivery is at least once
  5. Set your own deadline on the agent side and treat silence as a rejection

Trigger.dev

  1. Pass an explicit timeout to wait.createToken() and handle ok: false as a timeout
  2. Use an idempotency key when creating the token so a retried step doesn't send the reviewer a second request
  3. Give the browser the publicAccessToken, never the secret key, and don't call token.url from client code
  4. Tag tokens with the user or task ID so pending approvals can be listed per reviewer
  5. Start the MCP server with --readonly when the agent only needs to inspect runs

Other comparisons with gotoHuman or Trigger.dev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.