gotoHuman vs withHuman

gotoHuman

Built for agent review, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, a 3-tool MCP server, an n8n node and a Make app. No status page, published rate limits or documented error responses.

withHuman

The approval API is small and carefully specified, with a public OpenAPI 3.1 document, mandatory idempotency keys and agent credentials that can never approve. The service is in early access under its own terms, with no status page, published rate limits or changelog, and the open-source repository the site links to returned 404 on 8 October 2026.

gotoHuman

1. Call get-form-schema before request-human-review-with-form, since the field data must match the review type
2. Send agentId on every API request, because the API reference marks it required even though the JS SDK doesn't
3. Pass a webhookUrl per request when the review type has no default, or the answer has nowhere to go
4. Deduplicate webhook calls on the Idempotency-Key header, since delivery is at least once
5. Set your own deadline on the agent side and treat silence as a rejection

withHuman

1. Send an Idempotency-Key header on POST /api/aap/v1/requests. The call answers 400 without one
2. Read the decision with GET /api/aap/v1/requests/{id}?wait=30s and repeat while status is pending. wait is capped at 30 seconds
3. Set timeout between one second and seven days, and treat expired and cancelled as a refusal
4. Start an approved call within five minutes of decided_at, because the decision carries an expires_at
5. Cancel a request when you stop waiting, so reviewers stop seeing it