Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Pushary vs withHuman
withHuman and Pushary score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 51.8 (D) and 51.4 (D). Pushary leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do hitl approve.
Which one, for what
Pushary D
Good for One developer running coding agents unattended who wants questions and approvals on a phone.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 60 against 49
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 53
Watch for
No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front
Good for Teams that want tool calls from coding agents or their own agents held for approval by rules, with escalation and an audit log, and no review UI to build.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 73
- Security & auth, 73 against 64
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
Watch for
The terms say the service is in early access, and the API document is version 0.1.0
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Pushary | withHuman | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 16 | Pushary +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 73 | 81 | withHuman +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 74 | Pushary +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 73 | withHuman +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 30 | withHuman +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 49 | Pushary +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 53 | Pushary +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | 51.4 · D | 51.8 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Pushary | withHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Pushary | Metoro Inc |
| Hosted endpoint | https://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp | https://app.withhuman.ai |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (skill, hooks and adapters) | Proprietary hosted service under Metoro Inc's terms. The site describes an open-source edition, but the repository it links to returned 404 on 8 October 2026 |
| Tools exposed | 6 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.Pushary/pushary | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-27 | 2026-09-04 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-04 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Pushary
Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.
withHuman
The approval API is small and carefully specified, with a public OpenAPI 3.1 document, mandatory idempotency keys and agent credentials that can never approve. The service is in early access under its own terms, with no status page, published rate limits or changelog, and the open-source repository the site links to returned 404 on 8 October 2026.
Before you call either
Pushary
- Read
answered,statusandhandoffActionon every result, and never treat a timeout as approval - Expect
ask_userto return at once withanswered: falsewhen the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only - Poll
wait_for_answeronce (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping - Cancel a live question with
cancel_questionbefore asking the same thing in chat - Group open decisions into one
selectquestion, since each push interrupts the user
withHuman
- Send an
Idempotency-Keyheader onPOST /api/aap/v1/requests. The call answers 400 without one - Read the decision with
GET /api/aap/v1/requests/{id}?wait=30sand repeat whilestatusispending.waitis capped at 30 seconds - Set
timeoutbetween one second and seven days, and treatexpiredandcancelledas a refusal - Start an approved call within five minutes of
decided_at, because the decision carries anexpires_at - Cancel a request when you stop waiting, so reviewers stop seeing it
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Pushary or withHuman?
withHuman and Pushary score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 51.8 (D) and 51.4 (D). Pushary leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Do Pushary and withHuman need an API key?
Pushary needs an API key. withHuman takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Pushary and withHuman without installing anything?
Yes. Pushary has a hosted endpoint at https://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp and withHuman at https://app.withhuman.ai.
Other comparisons with Pushary or withHuman
- gotoHuman vs Pushary
- gotoHuman vs withHuman
- Inngest vs Pushary
- Inngest vs withHuman
- Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Pushary
- Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs withHuman
- Permit MCP Gateway vs Pushary
- Permit MCP Gateway vs withHuman
- Pushary vs Restate
- Pushary vs Temporal
- Pushary vs Trigger.dev
- Restate vs withHuman
- Temporal vs withHuman
- Trigger.dev vs withHuman
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/pushary-vs-withhuman.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/pushary.json·/api/v1/tools/withhuman.json - From a terminal
anchor compare pushary withhuman(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "pushary", "b": "withhuman"}at/mcp, no key