Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Permit MCP Gateway vs Pushary

Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 27 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Permit MCP Gateway for

  • reliability (+27)
  • agent ergonomics (+7)
  • security & auth (+16)

Pick Pushary for

  • schema & documentation (+20)
  • maintenance & community (+17)
  • transparency & trust (+18)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPermit MCP GatewayPusharyEdge
Reliability16%204720Permit MCP Gateway +27
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25373Pushary +20
Agent ergonomics13%16.28376Permit MCP Gateway +7
Security & auth14%17.58064Permit MCP Gateway +16
Payments & pricing10%12.51010even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84360Pushary +17
Transparency & trust7%8.84563Pushary +18
Negative events≤1500
Total54.5 · C51.4 · D

Facts side by side

FactPermit MCP GatewayPushary
KindModel platformMCP server
VendorPermit.ioPushary
Hosted endpointhttps://{subdomain}.agent.security/mcphttps://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp
TransportsStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)
AuthOAuthAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicencenoneMIT (skill, hooks and adapters)
Tools exposednone6
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
MCP registrynot listedio.github.Pushary/pushary
Last releasenone2026-10-01
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Permit MCP Gateway

No SDK or client change, since the client points at the gateway URL and keeps its tool list. Approvals are Enterprise only, through a demo, with no published price.

Pushary

Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.

Before you call either

Permit MCP Gateway

  1. Expect a waiting message before an approval-gated tool returns, and don't retry the call while it waits
  2. Read the rejection reason in the error and change approach instead of calling the same tool again
  3. Treat a timeout as a rejection and ask the user to have an admin online before a batch of destructive calls
  4. Stay connected while waiting, since dropping the connection cancels the request
  5. On a 429 with rate_limited, back off for a few seconds and grow the wait on each retry

Pushary

  1. Read answered, status and handoffAction on every result, and never treat a timeout as approval
  2. Expect ask_user to return at once with answered: false when the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only
  3. Poll wait_for_answer once (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping
  4. Cancel a live question with cancel_question before asking the same thing in chat
  5. Group open decisions into one select question, since each push interrupts the user

Other comparisons with Permit MCP Gateway or Pushary

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.