# Permit MCP Gateway vs Pushary (slim)

> Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 27 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary.md (~1,400 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 27 points.

- Permit MCP Gateway: C 54.5, rank #321 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/permit-mcp-gateway.min.md
- Pushary: D 51.4, rank #350 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pushary.min.md
- Pick Permit MCP Gateway for reliability (+27), agent ergonomics (+7), security & auth (+16). Pick Pushary for schema & documentation (+20), maintenance & community (+17), transparency & trust (+18).

| Category | Permit MCP Gateway | Pushary |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 47 | 20 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 53 | 73 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 83 | 76 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 80 | 64 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 10 | 10 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 43 | 60 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 45 | 63 |