# Permit MCP Gateway vs Pushary

> Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 27 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary.md (~1,400 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-04

Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 27 points.

- Permit MCP Gateway: grade C, 54.5/100, rank #321 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/permit-mcp-gateway.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/permit-mcp-gateway.json
- Pushary: grade D, 51.4/100, rank #350 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pushary.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pushary.json

## Which one, for what

Pick Permit MCP Gateway for reliability (+27), agent ergonomics (+7), security & auth (+16).

Pick Pushary for schema & documentation (+20), maintenance & community (+17), transparency & trust (+18).

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Permit MCP Gateway | Pushary | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 47 | 20 | Permit MCP Gateway +27 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 53 | 73 | Pushary +20 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 76 | Permit MCP Gateway +7 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 80 | 64 | Permit MCP Gateway +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 10 | 10 | even |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 43 | 60 | Pushary +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 45 | 63 | Pushary +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **54.5 · C** | **51.4 · D** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Permit MCP Gateway | Pushary |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Model platform | MCP server |
| Vendor | Permit.io | Pushary |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://{subdomain}.agent.security/mcp` | `https://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp` |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | MIT (skill, hooks and adapters) |
| Tools exposed | none | 6 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.Pushary/pushary` |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**Permit MCP Gateway.** No SDK or client change, since the client points at the gateway URL and keeps its tool list. Approvals are Enterprise only, through a demo, with no published price.

**Pushary.** Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.

## Before you call either

### Permit MCP Gateway

1. Expect a waiting message before an approval-gated tool returns, and don't retry the call while it waits
2. Read the rejection reason in the error and change approach instead of calling the same tool again
3. Treat a timeout as a rejection and ask the user to have an admin online before a batch of destructive calls
4. Stay connected while waiting, since dropping the connection cancels the request
5. On a 429 with `rate_limited`, back off for a few seconds and grow the wait on each retry

### Pushary

1. Read `answered`, `status` and `handoffAction` on every result, and never treat a timeout as approval
2. Expect `ask_user` to return at once with `answered: false` when the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only
3. Poll `wait_for_answer` once (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping
4. Cancel a live question with `cancel_question` before asking the same thing in chat
5. Group open decisions into one `select` question, since each push interrupts the user

## Other comparisons with Permit MCP Gateway or Pushary

- [gotoHuman vs Permit MCP Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-permit-mcp-gateway.md)
- [gotoHuman vs Pushary](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-pushary.md)
- [Inngest vs Permit MCP Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inngest-vs-permit-mcp-gateway.md)
- [Inngest vs Pushary](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inngest-vs-pushary.md)
- [Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Permit MCP Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orkes-conductor-vs-permit-mcp-gateway.md)
- [Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Pushary](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orkes-conductor-vs-pushary.md)
- [Permit MCP Gateway vs Temporal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-temporal.md)
- [Permit MCP Gateway vs Trigger.dev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-trigger-dev.md)
- [Pushary vs Temporal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pushary-vs-temporal.md)
- [Pushary vs Trigger.dev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pushary-vs-trigger-dev.md)