Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Pushary vs Temporal

Temporal has a score of 77.2 (BB) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is reliability, 65 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Pushary for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Temporal for

  • reliability (+65)
  • schema & documentation (+18)
  • agent ergonomics (+9)
  • security & auth (+22)
  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • maintenance & community (+30)
  • transparency & trust (+7)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPusharyTemporalEdge
Reliability16%202085Temporal +65
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27391Temporal +18
Agent ergonomics13%16.27685Temporal +9
Security & auth14%17.56486Temporal +22
Payments & pricing10%12.51020Temporal +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86090Temporal +30
Transparency & trust7%8.86370Temporal +7
Negative events≤1500
Total51.4 · D77.2 · BB

Facts side by side

FactPusharyTemporal
KindMCP serverModel platform
VendorPusharyTemporal Technologies
Hosted endpointhttps://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcpno (local only)
TransportsStreamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)HTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidPay per use
x402nono
LicenceMIT (skill, hooks and adapters)MIT
Tools exposed6none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registryio.github.Pushary/pusharynot listed
Last release2026-10-012026-09-15
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Pushary

Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.

Temporal

Waits of any length with a timeout survive worker restarts and deploys. No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code.

Before you call either

Pushary

  1. Read answered, status and handoffAction on every result, and never treat a timeout as approval
  2. Expect ask_user to return at once with answered: false when the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only
  3. Poll wait_for_answer once (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping
  4. Cancel a live question with cancel_question before asking the same thing in chat
  5. Group open decisions into one select question, since each push interrupts the user

Temporal

  1. Put the decision in a typed Signal payload (approver, decision, comments, timestamp) instead of a bare boolean
  2. Always wait with a timeout and treat the timeout path as a rejection or an escalation on purpose
  3. Use the workflow ID as the approval ID, so the reviewer's tool only needs one value to send the Signal
  4. Use an Update instead of a Signal when the approver's tool needs an acknowledgement back
  5. Expect ResourceExhausted under load and let the SDK retry it, since signals are throttled last

Other comparisons with Pushary or Temporal

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.