Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Temporal vs Trigger.dev
Temporal has a score of 77.2 (BB) against Trigger.dev's 74.8 (BB). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 20 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Temporal for
- reliability (+10)
- agent ergonomics (+6)
- security & auth (+13)
Pick Trigger.dev for
- payments & pricing (+20)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Temporal | Trigger.dev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 85 | 75 | Temporal +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 91 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 85 | 79 | Temporal +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 86 | 73 | Temporal +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 40 | Trigger.dev +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 74 | Trigger.dev +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 77.2 · BB | 74.8 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Temporal | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Temporal Technologies | Trigger.dev |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.trigger.dev |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 31 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.triggerdotdev/trigger.dev |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.6/5 (8) | 3.6/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Temporal
Waits of any length with a timeout survive worker restarts and deploys. No reviewer inbox, notifications or routing, so the human side is all your code.
Trigger.dev
Tokens complete from a backend, a pre-signed callback URL or the browser with a token scoped to one waitpoint. 10-minute default timeout on tokens.
Before you call either
Temporal
- Put the decision in a typed Signal payload (approver, decision, comments, timestamp) instead of a bare boolean
- Always wait with a timeout and treat the timeout path as a rejection or an escalation on purpose
- Use the workflow ID as the approval ID, so the reviewer's tool only needs one value to send the Signal
- Use an Update instead of a Signal when the approver's tool needs an acknowledgement back
- Expect
ResourceExhaustedunder load and let the SDK retry it, since signals are throttled last
Trigger.dev
- Pass an explicit
timeouttowait.createToken()and handleok: falseas a timeout - Use an idempotency key when creating the token so a retried step doesn't send the reviewer a second request
- Give the browser the
publicAccessToken, never the secret key, and don't calltoken.urlfrom client code - Tag tokens with the user or task ID so pending approvals can be listed per reviewer
- Start the MCP server with
--readonlywhen the agent only needs to inspect runs
Other comparisons with Temporal or Trigger.dev
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/temporal.json·/api/v1/tools/trigger-dev.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/temporal-vs-trigger-dev.md