Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Restate vs Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev scores 74.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Restate's 73.3 (BB), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Restate leads on reliability. Both do hitl approve.
Which one, for what
Restate BB
Good for A team that already writes agent steps as durable handlers and wants a long, cheap wait for a human answer in TypeScript, Python, Java, Go or Rust, with the option to self-host.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 91 against 75
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email. The approval request and the reply endpoint are the builder's code
Trigger.dev BB
Good for A TypeScript team that wants an approval pause inside background jobs or AI chat agents, with the reviewer UI built in their own app.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 85
- Security & auth, 73 against 61
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 50
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
10-minute default timeout on tokens
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Restate | Trigger.dev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 91 | 75 | Restate +16 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 91 | Trigger.dev +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 81 | 79 | Restate +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 61 | 73 | Trigger.dev +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 92 | 90 | Restate +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 50 | 73 | Trigger.dev +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 73.3 · BB | 74.7 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Restate | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Restate GmbH | Trigger.dev |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.trigger.dev |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | BSL 1.1 converting to Apache-2.0 four years after release (server), MIT (SDKs) | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 31 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.triggerdotdev/trigger.dev |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-06-29 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-12-23 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 4.5k stars, 329k npm/wk, 76k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.6/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Restate
An awakeable pauses a handler at no compute cost and resumes it from one HTTP request, with a durable timeout, on a free plan of 100,000 actions a month. Restate sends nothing to the approver, so the Slack message, email or inbox is the builder's code, and the published terms and privacy statement predate the paid plans.
Trigger.dev
Tokens complete from a backend, a pre-signed callback URL or the browser with a token scoped to one waitpoint. 10-minute default timeout on tokens.
Before you call either
Restate
- Create the awakeable, send its ID inside
ctx.run, then await the promise, so a retry doesn't send a second approval request - Resolve with
POST /restate/awakeables/<id>/resolveand a JSON body, or/rejectwith a text reason, which throws a terminal error in the handler - On Restate Cloud send
Authorization: Bearer key_...tohttps://<env_id>.env.<region>.restate.cloud:8080. On a self-hosted server put an authenticating proxy in front of port 8080 - Wrap the wait in
orTimeoutand decide what a timeout means. Without it the handler waits with no limit - Retry ingress errors only on 408, 425, 429 or 5xx, and only when
x-restate-error-sourceisn'tinvocation
Trigger.dev
- Pass an explicit
timeouttowait.createToken()and handleok: falseas a timeout - Use an idempotency key when creating the token so a retried step doesn't send the reviewer a second request
- Give the browser the
publicAccessToken, never the secret key, and don't calltoken.urlfrom client code - Tag tokens with the user or task ID so pending approvals can be listed per reviewer
- Start the MCP server with
--readonlywhen the agent only needs to inspect runs
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Restate or Trigger.dev?
Trigger.dev scores 74.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Restate's 73.3 (BB), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Restate leads on reliability.
Are Restate and Trigger.dev open source?
No open-source release is listed for Restate. Trigger.dev is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Restate or Trigger.dev
- gotoHuman vs Restate
- gotoHuman vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Restate
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev
- Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Restate
- Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Trigger.dev
- Permit MCP Gateway vs Restate
- Permit MCP Gateway vs Trigger.dev
- Pushary vs Restate
- Pushary vs Trigger.dev
- Restate vs Temporal
- Temporal vs Trigger.dev
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/restate-vs-trigger-dev.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/restate.json·/api/v1/tools/trigger-dev.json - From a terminal
anchor compare restate trigger-dev(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "restate", "b": "trigger-dev"}at/mcp, no key