Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
Inngest vs Restate
Restate scores 73.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Inngest's 66 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do hitl approve.
Which one, for what
Inngest B
Good for A TypeScript, Python or Go team that already runs agent steps as durable functions and wants a cheap, long wait for a human answer.
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email, so the human side is your code
Restate BB
Good for A team that already writes agent steps as durable handlers and wants a long, cheap wait for a human answer in TypeScript, Python, Java, Go or Rust, with the option to self-host.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 91 against 57
- Agent ergonomics, 81 against 76
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email. The approval request and the reply endpoint are the builder's code
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inngest | Restate | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 57 | 91 | Restate +34 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 85 | Inngest +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 81 | Restate +5 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 61 | Restate +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 88 | 92 | Restate +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 50 | Inngest +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 66 · B | 73.3 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inngest | Restate |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Inngest | Restate GmbH |
| Hosted endpoint | https://inn.gs/e/ | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | SSPL with delayed Apache-2.0 (server), Apache-2.0 (SDKs) | BSL 1.1 converting to Apache-2.0 four years after release (server), MIT (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 4.5k stars, 329k npm/wk, 76k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Inngest
Waits are durable and cost nothing while suspended, with runs up to 30 days on Free and 366 on Business. No reviewer inbox, Slack app or email, so the human side is your code.
Restate
An awakeable pauses a handler at no compute cost and resumes it from one HTTP request, with a durable timeout, on a free plan of 100,000 actions a month. Restate sends nothing to the approver, so the Slack message, email or inbox is the builder's code, and the published terms and privacy statement predate the paid plans.
Before you call either
Inngest
- Use
step.waitForSignal()when one run waits for one answer, andwaitForEventonly when one answer resumes many runs - Register the wait before you send the approval request, or check the external state first, since early events are missed
- Use a unique approval ID per tool call and
matchon it, so parallel approvals resolve independently - Treat
nullorundefinedas a timeout and decide on purpose whether that rejects, approves or escalates - Set an event
idwhen sending the answer, so a retried send is dropped within 24 hours
Restate
- Create the awakeable, send its ID inside
ctx.run, then await the promise, so a retry doesn't send a second approval request - Resolve with
POST /restate/awakeables/<id>/resolveand a JSON body, or/rejectwith a text reason, which throws a terminal error in the handler - On Restate Cloud send
Authorization: Bearer key_...tohttps://<env_id>.env.<region>.restate.cloud:8080. On a self-hosted server put an authenticating proxy in front of port 8080 - Wrap the wait in
orTimeoutand decide what a timeout means. Without it the handler waits with no limit - Retry ingress errors only on 408, 425, 429 or 5xx, and only when
x-restate-error-sourceisn'tinvocation
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inngest or Restate?
Restate scores 73.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Inngest's 66 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Inngest or Restate
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inngest-vs-restate.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inngest.json·/api/v1/tools/restate.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inngest restate(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inngest", "b": "restate"}at/mcp, no key