Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run
gotoHuman vs Pushary
Pushary has a score of 51.4 (D) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 24 points.
Which one, for what
Pick gotoHuman for
- payments & pricing (+20)
Pick Pushary for
- schema & documentation (+24)
- agent ergonomics (+14)
- security & auth (+20)
- transparency & trust (+8)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gotoHuman | Pushary | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 20 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 49 | 73 | Pushary +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 76 | Pushary +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 64 | Pushary +20 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 10 | gotoHuman +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 64 | 60 | gotoHuman +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 63 | Pushary +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 43.9 · E | 51.4 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gotoHuman | Pushary |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | gotoHuman | Pushary |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.gotohuman.com | https://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs and MCP server) | MIT (skill, hooks and adapters) |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 6 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.Pushary/pushary |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
gotoHuman
Built for agent review, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, a 3-tool MCP server, an n8n node and a Make app. No status page, published rate limits or documented error responses.
Pushary
Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.
Before you call either
gotoHuman
- Call
get-form-schemabeforerequest-human-review-with-form, since the field data must match the review type - Send
agentIdon every API request, because the API reference marks it required even though the JS SDK doesn't - Pass a
webhookUrlper request when the review type has no default, or the answer has nowhere to go - Deduplicate webhook calls on the
Idempotency-Keyheader, since delivery is at least once - Set your own deadline on the agent side and treat silence as a rejection
Pushary
- Read
answered,statusandhandoffActionon every result, and never treat a timeout as approval - Expect
ask_userto return at once withanswered: falsewhen the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only - Poll
wait_for_answeronce (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping - Cancel a live question with
cancel_questionbefore asking the same thing in chat - Group open decisions into one
selectquestion, since each push interrupts the user
Other comparisons with gotoHuman or Pushary
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/gotohuman.json·/api/v1/tools/pushary.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/gotohuman-vs-pushary.md