Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

gotoHuman vs Pushary

Pushary has a score of 51.4 (D) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 24 points.

Which one, for what

Pick gotoHuman for

  • payments & pricing (+20)

Pick Pushary for

  • schema & documentation (+24)
  • agent ergonomics (+14)
  • security & auth (+20)
  • transparency & trust (+8)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this rungotoHumanPusharyEdge
Reliability16%202020even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24973Pushary +24
Agent ergonomics13%16.26276Pushary +14
Security & auth14%17.54464Pushary +20
Payments & pricing10%12.53010gotoHuman +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86460gotoHuman +4
Transparency & trust7%8.85563Pushary +8
Negative events≤1500
Total43.9 · E51.4 · D

Facts side by side

FactgotoHumanPushary
KindHTTP APIMCP server
VendorgotoHumanPushary
Hosted endpointhttps://api.gotohuman.comhttps://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp
TransportsHTTP, stdioStreamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDKs and MCP server)MIT (skill, hooks and adapters)
Tools exposed36
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrynot listedio.github.Pushary/pushary
Last release2026-09-242026-10-01
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

gotoHuman

Built for agent review, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, a 3-tool MCP server, an n8n node and a Make app. No status page, published rate limits or documented error responses.

Pushary

Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.

Before you call either

gotoHuman

  1. Call get-form-schema before request-human-review-with-form, since the field data must match the review type
  2. Send agentId on every API request, because the API reference marks it required even though the JS SDK doesn't
  3. Pass a webhookUrl per request when the review type has no default, or the answer has nowhere to go
  4. Deduplicate webhook calls on the Idempotency-Key header, since delivery is at least once
  5. Set your own deadline on the agent side and treat silence as a rejection

Pushary

  1. Read answered, status and handoffAction on every result, and never treat a timeout as approval
  2. Expect ask_user to return at once with answered: false when the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only
  3. Poll wait_for_answer once (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping
  4. Cancel a live question with cancel_question before asking the same thing in chat
  5. Group open decisions into one select question, since each push interrupts the user

Other comparisons with gotoHuman or Pushary

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.