Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Pushary

Orkes Conductor Human tasks has a score of 54.2 (C) against Pushary's 51.4 (D). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 21 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Orkes Conductor Human tasks for

  • reliability (+12)
  • security & auth (+7)
  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • maintenance & community (+21)

Pick Pushary for

  • schema & documentation (+8)
  • agent ergonomics (+7)
  • transparency & trust (+17)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runOrkes Conductor Human tasksPusharyEdge
Reliability16%203220Orkes Conductor Human tasks +12
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26573Pushary +8
Agent ergonomics13%16.26976Pushary +7
Security & auth14%17.57164Orkes Conductor Human tasks +7
Payments & pricing10%12.52010Orkes Conductor Human tasks +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88160Orkes Conductor Human tasks +21
Transparency & trust7%8.84663Pushary +17
Negative events≤1500
Total54.2 · C51.4 · D

Facts side by side

FactOrkes Conductor Human tasksPushary
KindModel platformMCP server
VendorOrkesPushary
Hosted endpointhttps://developer.orkescloud.com/apihttps://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp
TransportsHTTP, stdioStreamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (Conductor OSS and SDKs), proprietary (Orkes Conductor)MIT (skill, hooks and adapters)
Tools exposed196
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.conductor-oss/conductor-mcpio.github.Pushary/pushary
Last release2026-09-102026-10-01
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Escalation chains with a time limit per assignee and a choice of leaving the task open or failing the workflow. No built-in Slack or email prompt, so alerts need a trigger policy and a second workflow.

Pushary

Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.

Before you call either

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

  1. Give every assignment you want to escalate from a non-zero slaMinutes, since 0 never expires and nothing can follow it
  2. Pick TERMINATE for risky actions so an unanswered approval fails the workflow instead of staying open to anyone
  3. Start approval workflows with an idempotencyKey and RETURN_EXISTING, so a retried start doesn't ask twice
  4. Refresh the JWT from /api/token with a set expiry instead of requesting one that never expires
  5. Fetch single doc pages, not llms.txt, which is the whole documentation in 2.57 MB

Pushary

  1. Read answered, status and handoffAction on every result, and never treat a timeout as approval
  2. Expect ask_user to return at once with answered: false when the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only
  3. Poll wait_for_answer once (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping
  4. Cancel a live question with cancel_question before asking the same thing in chat
  5. Group open decisions into one select question, since each push interrupts the user

Other comparisons with Orkes Conductor Human tasks or Pushary

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.