Head to head · Hitl approve · October 2026 research run

Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Permit MCP Gateway

Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against Orkes Conductor Human tasks's 54.2 (C). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 38 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Orkes Conductor Human tasks for

  • schema & documentation (+12)
  • payments & pricing (+10)
  • maintenance & community (+38)

Pick Permit MCP Gateway for

  • reliability (+15)
  • agent ergonomics (+14)
  • security & auth (+9)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runOrkes Conductor Human tasksPermit MCP GatewayEdge
Reliability16%203247Permit MCP Gateway +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26553Orkes Conductor Human tasks +12
Agent ergonomics13%16.26983Permit MCP Gateway +14
Security & auth14%17.57180Permit MCP Gateway +9
Payments & pricing10%12.52010Orkes Conductor Human tasks +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88143Orkes Conductor Human tasks +38
Transparency & trust7%8.84645Orkes Conductor Human tasks +1
Negative events≤1500
Total54.2 · C54.5 · C

Facts side by side

FactOrkes Conductor Human tasksPermit MCP Gateway
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorOrkesPermit.io
Hosted endpointhttps://developer.orkescloud.com/apihttps://{subdomain}.agent.security/mcp
TransportsHTTP, stdioStreamable HTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (Conductor OSS and SDKs), proprietary (Orkes Conductor)none
Tools exposed19none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.conductor-oss/conductor-mcpnot listed
Last release2026-09-10none
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

Escalation chains with a time limit per assignee and a choice of leaving the task open or failing the workflow. No built-in Slack or email prompt, so alerts need a trigger policy and a second workflow.

Permit MCP Gateway

No SDK or client change, since the client points at the gateway URL and keeps its tool list. Approvals are Enterprise only, through a demo, with no published price.

Before you call either

Orkes Conductor Human tasks

  1. Give every assignment you want to escalate from a non-zero slaMinutes, since 0 never expires and nothing can follow it
  2. Pick TERMINATE for risky actions so an unanswered approval fails the workflow instead of staying open to anyone
  3. Start approval workflows with an idempotencyKey and RETURN_EXISTING, so a retried start doesn't ask twice
  4. Refresh the JWT from /api/token with a set expiry instead of requesting one that never expires
  5. Fetch single doc pages, not llms.txt, which is the whole documentation in 2.57 MB

Permit MCP Gateway

  1. Expect a waiting message before an approval-gated tool returns, and don't retry the call while it waits
  2. Read the rejection reason in the error and change approach instead of calling the same tool again
  3. Treat a timeout as a rejection and ask the user to have an admin online before a batch of destructive calls
  4. Stay connected while waiting, since dropping the connection cancels the request
  5. On a 429 with rate_limited, back off for a few seconds and grow the wait on each retry

Other comparisons with Orkes Conductor Human tasks or Permit MCP Gateway

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.