# gotoHuman vs Pushary

> Pushary has a score of 51.4 (D) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 24 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-pushary
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-pushary.md (~1,400 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-pushary.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-pushary.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-05

Pushary has a score of 51.4 (D) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 24 points.

- gotoHuman: grade E, 43.9/100, rank #407 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gotohuman.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gotohuman.json
- Pushary: grade D, 51.4/100, rank #350 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pushary.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pushary.json

## Which one, for what

Pick gotoHuman for payments & pricing (+20).

Pick Pushary for schema & documentation (+24), agent ergonomics (+14), security & auth (+20), transparency & trust (+8).

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | gotoHuman | Pushary | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 20 | 20 | even |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 49 | 73 | Pushary +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 62 | 76 | Pushary +14 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 44 | 64 | Pushary +20 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 10 | gotoHuman +20 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 64 | 60 | gotoHuman +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 55 | 63 | Pushary +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **43.9 · E** | **51.4 · D** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | gotoHuman | Pushary |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | gotoHuman | Pushary |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.gotohuman.com` | `https://pushary.com/api/mcp/mcp` |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs and MCP server) | MIT (skill, hooks and adapters) |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 6 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.Pushary/pushary` |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**gotoHuman.** Built for agent review, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, a 3-tool MCP server, an n8n node and a Make app. No status page, published rate limits or documented error responses.

**Pushary.** Six small tools with a detailed skill that says when to ask, when to notify and when to stay quiet. No free plan, and the 3-day trial takes a card up front.

## Before you call either

### gotoHuman

1. Call `get-form-schema` before `request-human-review-with-form`, since the field data must match the review type
2. Send `agentId` on every API request, because the API reference marks it required even though the JS SDK doesn't
3. Pass a `webhookUrl` per request when the review type has no default, or the answer has nowhere to go
4. Deduplicate webhook calls on the `Idempotency-Key` header, since delivery is at least once
5. Set your own deadline on the agent side and treat silence as a rejection

### Pushary

1. Read `answered`, `status` and `handoffAction` on every result, and never treat a timeout as approval
2. Expect `ask_user` to return at once with `answered: false` when the user's mode is notify-only or terminal-only
3. Poll `wait_for_answer` once (it waits at most 55 seconds), then follow the handoff instead of looping
4. Cancel a live question with `cancel_question` before asking the same thing in chat
5. Group open decisions into one `select` question, since each push interrupts the user

## Other comparisons with gotoHuman or Pushary

- [gotoHuman vs Inngest](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-inngest.md)
- [gotoHuman vs Orkes Conductor Human tasks](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-orkes-conductor.md)
- [gotoHuman vs Permit MCP Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-permit-mcp-gateway.md)
- [gotoHuman vs Temporal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-temporal.md)
- [gotoHuman vs Trigger.dev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-trigger-dev.md)
- [Inngest vs Pushary](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inngest-vs-pushary.md)
- [Orkes Conductor Human tasks vs Pushary](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orkes-conductor-vs-pushary.md)
- [Permit MCP Gateway vs Pushary](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/permit-mcp-gateway-vs-pushary.md)
- [Pushary vs Temporal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pushary-vs-temporal.md)
- [Pushary vs Trigger.dev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pushary-vs-trigger-dev.md)