Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Baseten vs Koyeb
Baseten has a score of 66.7 (B) against Koyeb's 47 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 67 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Baseten for
- reliability (+20)
- schema & documentation (+43)
- security & auth (+32)
- payments & pricing (+20)
- maintenance & community (+67)
Pick Koyeb for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baseten | Koyeb | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 60 | Baseten +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 41 | Baseten +43 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 56 | Koyeb +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 50 | Baseten +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | Baseten +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 23 | Baseten +67 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 68 | Koyeb +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.7 · B | 47 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baseten | Koyeb |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | Baseten | Koyeb |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baseten.co | https://app.koyeb.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | Token |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-05-12 |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 72 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Baseten
Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.
Koyeb
H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.
Before you call either
Baseten
- Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
- Sleep for
retry_afterseconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute - Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
- Set
scale_down_delaybelow the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes - Send payloads over 256 KiB to
/predict, not/async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit
Koyeb
- Pass
dry_runon service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys - Page service lists with
limitandoffsetand filter bystatusesinstead of fetching everything - Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
- Set
--min-scale 0on GPU services so idle instances stop billing - Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it
Other comparisons with Baseten or Koyeb
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/baseten.json·/api/v1/tools/koyeb.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/baseten-vs-koyeb.md