Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Baseten vs Beam
Baseten has a score of 66.7 (B) against Beam's 55.5 (C). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is security & auth, 32 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Baseten for
- reliability (+25)
- schema & documentation (+26)
- security & auth (+32)
- maintenance & community (+5)
Pick Beam for
- transparency & trust (+7)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baseten | Beam | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 55 | Baseten +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 58 | Baseten +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 58 | Beam +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 50 | Baseten +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 85 | Baseten +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 74 | Beam +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | -2 | |
| Total | 66.7 · B | 55.5 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baseten | Beam |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | Baseten | Beam |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baseten.co | https://app.beam.cloud/api/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 1.8k stars, 8.5k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Baseten
Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.
Beam
Per-millisecond billing with cold starts and image pulls free, H100 PCIe at $3.50 and RTX 4090 at $0.69 an hour. No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA.
Before you call either
Baseten
- Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
- Sleep for
retry_afterseconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute - Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
- Set
scale_down_delaybelow the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes - Send payloads over 256 KiB to
/predict, not/async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit
Beam
- Check the response body for
ok: falseon gateway calls; a failure can arrive as HTTP 200 - Don't pipe
beam deploy --format jsonoutput into CI logs, since it contains the workspace token - Route anything over 180 seconds to a task queue and poll the task instead of holding the endpoint request
- Set
keep_warm_secondsdeliberately; the 180-second endpoint default bills three minutes of GPU after every call - Pass
gpu=["RTX4090", "A10G"]so a job still schedules when one type is out
Other comparisons with Baseten or Beam
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/baseten.json·/api/v1/tools/beam.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/baseten-vs-beam.md