Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run

Beam vs Cerebrium

Beam and Cerebrium score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 55.5 (C) and 55.3 (C). Cerebrium leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do compute gpu.

Which one, for what

Beam C

Good for Cost-sensitive Python teams running bursty GPU functions on consumer or PCIe cards, and anyone who wants the option to self-host the same runtime.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 55 against 48
  • Agent ergonomics, 58 against 49
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 85 against 75
  • Transparency & trust, 74 against 63

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA

Cerebrium C

Good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 70 against 58
  • Security & auth, 60 against 50

Watch for

disable_auth defaults to true, so a deployed endpoint answers without a token unless the owner changes it

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBeamCerebriumEdge
Reliability16%205548Beam +7
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25870Cerebrium +12
Agent ergonomics13%16.25849Beam +9
Security & auth14%17.55060Cerebrium +10
Payments & pricing10%12.54030Beam +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88575Beam +10
Transparency & trust7%8.87463Beam +11
Negative events≤15-20
Total55.5 · C55.3 · C

Facts side by side

FactBeamCerebrium
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorBeamCerebrium Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://app.beam.cloud/api/v1https://rest.cerebrium.ai
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceAGPL-3.0Proprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-012026-09-16
Terms last updated2026-09-14no date given
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-14no date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesnot found in the text
Popularity1.8k stars, 8.5k PyPI/wk920 PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Beam

Per-millisecond billing with cold starts and image pulls free, H100 PCIe at $3.50 and RTX 4090 at $0.69 an hour. No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA.

Cerebrium

Per-second GPU prices are public, a 94-operation OpenAPI spec covers the management API, and service account tokens expire and are limited to named projects. Deployed endpoints are callable without a token unless disable_auth = false is set, and no request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA were found in the reviewed documentation.

Before you call either

Beam

  1. Check the response body for ok: false on gateway calls; a failure can arrive as HTTP 200
  2. Don't pipe beam deploy --format json output into CI logs, since it contains the workspace token
  3. Route anything over 180 seconds to a task queue and poll the task instead of holding the endpoint request
  4. Set keep_warm_seconds deliberately; the 180-second endpoint default bills three minutes of GPU after every call
  5. Pass gpu=["RTX4090", "A10G"] so a job still schedules when one type is out

Cerebrium

  1. Set disable_auth = false in cerebrium.toml before deploying. The default leaves the endpoint callable by anyone with the URL
  2. Authenticate headless with CEREBRIUM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN. cerebrium login opens a browser
  3. Raise response_grace_period for long work. It defaults to 15 minutes and async runs stop at 12 hours
  4. Send ?async=true to get a run_id with HTTP 202, and add webhookEndpoint because async calls return no result to the caller
  5. Check the plan before choosing hardware. A100, H100, H200, B200 and RTX PRO 6000 need Standard, and protected compute bills at twice the listed rate

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Beam or Cerebrium?

Beam and Cerebrium score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 55.5 (C) and 55.3 (C). Cerebrium leads on schema & documentation and security & auth.

Are Beam and Cerebrium open source?

Beam is open source (AGPL-3.0). No open-source release is listed for Cerebrium.

Other comparisons with Beam or Cerebrium

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.