Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Beam vs Cerebrium
Beam and Cerebrium score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 55.5 (C) and 55.3 (C). Cerebrium leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do compute gpu.
Which one, for what
Beam C
Good for Cost-sensitive Python teams running bursty GPU functions on consumer or PCIe cards, and anyone who wants the option to self-host the same runtime.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 55 against 48
- Agent ergonomics, 58 against 49
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 75
- Transparency & trust, 74 against 63
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA
Good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 70 against 58
- Security & auth, 60 against 50
Watch for
disable_auth defaults to true, so a deployed endpoint answers without a token unless the owner changes it
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Beam | Cerebrium | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 48 | Beam +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 70 | Cerebrium +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 49 | Beam +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 60 | Cerebrium +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Beam +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 75 | Beam +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 63 | Beam +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.5 · C | 55.3 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Beam | Cerebrium |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Beam | Cerebrium Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.beam.cloud/api/v1 | https://rest.cerebrium.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-16 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-14 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-14 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.8k stars, 8.5k PyPI/wk | 920 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Beam
Per-millisecond billing with cold starts and image pulls free, H100 PCIe at $3.50 and RTX 4090 at $0.69 an hour. No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA.
Cerebrium
Per-second GPU prices are public, a 94-operation OpenAPI spec covers the management API, and service account tokens expire and are limited to named projects. Deployed endpoints are callable without a token unless disable_auth = false is set, and no request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA were found in the reviewed documentation.
Before you call either
Beam
- Check the response body for
ok: falseon gateway calls; a failure can arrive as HTTP 200 - Don't pipe
beam deploy --format jsonoutput into CI logs, since it contains the workspace token - Route anything over 180 seconds to a task queue and poll the task instead of holding the endpoint request
- Set
keep_warm_secondsdeliberately; the 180-second endpoint default bills three minutes of GPU after every call - Pass
gpu=["RTX4090", "A10G"]so a job still schedules when one type is out
Cerebrium
- Set
disable_auth = falseincerebrium.tomlbefore deploying. The default leaves the endpoint callable by anyone with the URL - Authenticate headless with
CEREBRIUM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN.cerebrium loginopens a browser - Raise
response_grace_periodfor long work. It defaults to 15 minutes and async runs stop at 12 hours - Send
?async=trueto get arun_idwith HTTP 202, and addwebhookEndpointbecause async calls return no result to the caller - Check the plan before choosing hardware. A100, H100, H200, B200 and RTX PRO 6000 need Standard, and
protectedcompute bills at twice the listed rate
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Beam or Cerebrium?
Beam and Cerebrium score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 55.5 (C) and 55.3 (C). Cerebrium leads on schema & documentation and security & auth.
Are Beam and Cerebrium open source?
Beam is open source (AGPL-3.0). No open-source release is listed for Cerebrium.
Other comparisons with Beam or Cerebrium
- Baseten vs Beam
- Baseten vs Cerebrium
- Beam vs CoreWeave
- Beam vs Koyeb
- Beam vs Lambda Cloud
- Beam vs Modal
- Beam vs Northflank
- Beam vs Replicate Deployments
- Beam vs Runpod
- Beam vs Vast.ai
- Cerebrium vs CoreWeave
- Cerebrium vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs Lambda Cloud
- Cerebrium vs Modal
- Cerebrium vs Northflank
- Cerebrium vs Replicate Deployments
- Cerebrium vs Runpod
- Cerebrium vs Vast.ai
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/beam-vs-cerebrium.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/beam.json·/api/v1/tools/cerebrium.json - From a terminal
anchor compare beam cerebrium(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "beam", "b": "cerebrium"}at/mcp, no key