Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Beam vs Koyeb
Beam has a score of 55.5 (C) against Koyeb's 47 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 62 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Beam for
- schema & documentation (+17)
- payments & pricing (+20)
- maintenance & community (+62)
- transparency & trust (+6)
Pick Koyeb for
- reliability (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Beam | Koyeb | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 60 | Koyeb +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 41 | Beam +17 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 56 | Beam +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | Beam +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 23 | Beam +62 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 68 | Beam +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.5 · C | 47 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Beam | Koyeb |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Beam | Koyeb |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.beam.cloud/api/v1 | https://app.koyeb.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | Token |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-05-12 |
| Popularity | 1.8k stars, 8.5k PyPI/wk | 72 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Beam
Per-millisecond billing with cold starts and image pulls free, H100 PCIe at $3.50 and RTX 4090 at $0.69 an hour. No published request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA.
Koyeb
H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.
Before you call either
Beam
- Check the response body for
ok: falseon gateway calls; a failure can arrive as HTTP 200 - Don't pipe
beam deploy --format jsonoutput into CI logs, since it contains the workspace token - Route anything over 180 seconds to a task queue and poll the task instead of holding the endpoint request
- Set
keep_warm_secondsdeliberately; the 180-second endpoint default bills three minutes of GPU after every call - Pass
gpu=["RTX4090", "A10G"]so a job still schedules when one type is out
Koyeb
- Pass
dry_runon service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys - Page service lists with
limitandoffsetand filter bystatusesinstead of fetching everything - Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
- Set
--min-scale 0on GPU services so idle instances stop billing - Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it
Other comparisons with Beam or Koyeb
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/beam.json·/api/v1/tools/koyeb.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/beam-vs-koyeb.md