Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Koyeb vs Runpod
Runpod has a score of 53.7 (D) against Koyeb's 47 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 59 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Koyeb for
- reliability (+25)
- agent ergonomics (+9)
Pick Runpod for
- schema & documentation (+40)
- security & auth (+10)
- maintenance & community (+59)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Koyeb | Runpod | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 35 | Koyeb +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 41 | 81 | Runpod +40 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 56 | 47 | Koyeb +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 60 | Runpod +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 20 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 23 | 82 | Runpod +59 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 68 | 65 | Koyeb +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 47 · D | 53.7 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Koyeb | Runpod |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Koyeb | Runpod |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.koyeb.com/v1 | https://api.runpod.ai/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | Token | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-05-12 | 2026-09-15 |
| Popularity | 72 stars | 314 stars, 22k npm/wk, 147k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Koyeb
H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.
Runpod
Per-second billing across more than a dozen serverless GPU classes, H100 at $4.79 and A100 80 GB at $2.72 an hour. Data-centre outages of 6 to 24 hours in each of July, August and September 2026.
Before you call either
Koyeb
- Pass
dry_runon service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys - Page service lists with
limitandoffsetand filter bystatusesinstead of fetching everything - Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
- Set
--min-scale 0on GPU services so idle instances stop billing - Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it
Runpod
- Create a Restricted or Read Only key per endpoint for the agent, not an All key
- Use REST v2 at api.runpod.io/v2 with a Bearer header; avoid GraphQL, which puts the key in the URL
- Fetch
/runresults within 30 minutes and/runsyncresults within 1 minute, or they're gone - Call
/retryon a failed job ID rather than submitting a duplicate job - Check
/healthbefore relying on an endpoint idle for a week, since max workers drop to 0
Other comparisons with Koyeb or Runpod
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/koyeb.json·/api/v1/tools/runpod.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/koyeb-vs-runpod.md