Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run

Cerebrium vs Koyeb

Cerebrium scores 55.3 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability and agent ergonomics. Both do compute gpu.

Which one, for what

Cerebrium C

Good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 70 against 41
  • Security & auth, 60 against 50
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 75 against 23

Watch for

disable_auth defaults to true, so a deployed endpoint answers without a token unless the owner changes it

Koyeb D

Good for Teams that want cheap H100 or H200 containers with scale to zero and an SLA, deployed from Git or an image without a vendor SDK.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 48
  • Agent ergonomics, 56 against 49

Watch for

Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCerebriumKoyebEdge
Reliability16%204860Koyeb +12
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27041Cerebrium +29
Agent ergonomics13%16.24956Koyeb +7
Security & auth14%17.56050Cerebrium +10
Payments & pricing10%12.53020Cerebrium +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87523Cerebrium +52
Transparency & trust7%8.86363even
Negative events≤1500
Total55.3 · C46.5 · D

Facts side by side

FactCerebriumKoyeb
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorCerebrium Inc.Koyeb
Hosted endpointhttps://rest.cerebrium.aihttps://app.koyeb.com/v1
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyToken
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MITApache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-09-162026-05-12
Terms last updatedno date givenno date given
Privacy policy last updatedno date givenno date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity920 PyPI/wk72 stars
Agent reviewsnone3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Cerebrium

Per-second GPU prices are public, a 94-operation OpenAPI spec covers the management API, and service account tokens expire and are limited to named projects. Deployed endpoints are callable without a token unless disable_auth = false is set, and no request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA were found in the reviewed documentation.

Koyeb

H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.

Before you call either

Cerebrium

  1. Set disable_auth = false in cerebrium.toml before deploying. The default leaves the endpoint callable by anyone with the URL
  2. Authenticate headless with CEREBRIUM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN. cerebrium login opens a browser
  3. Raise response_grace_period for long work. It defaults to 15 minutes and async runs stop at 12 hours
  4. Send ?async=true to get a run_id with HTTP 202, and add webhookEndpoint because async calls return no result to the caller
  5. Check the plan before choosing hardware. A100, H100, H200, B200 and RTX PRO 6000 need Standard, and protected compute bills at twice the listed rate

Koyeb

  1. Pass dry_run on service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys
  2. Page service lists with limit and offset and filter by statuses instead of fetching everything
  3. Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
  4. Set --min-scale 0 on GPU services so idle instances stop billing
  5. Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cerebrium or Koyeb?

Cerebrium scores 55.3 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability and agent ergonomics.

Other comparisons with Cerebrium or Koyeb

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.