Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Cerebrium vs Koyeb
Cerebrium scores 55.3 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability and agent ergonomics. Both do compute gpu.
Which one, for what
Good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 70 against 41
- Security & auth, 60 against 50
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 23
Watch for
disable_auth defaults to true, so a deployed endpoint answers without a token unless the owner changes it
Koyeb D
Good for Teams that want cheap H100 or H200 containers with scale to zero and an SLA, deployed from Git or an image without a vendor SDK.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 48
- Agent ergonomics, 56 against 49
Watch for
Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cerebrium | Koyeb | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 48 | 60 | Koyeb +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 70 | 41 | Cerebrium +29 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 49 | 56 | Koyeb +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 50 | Cerebrium +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Cerebrium +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 75 | 23 | Cerebrium +52 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 63 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 55.3 · C | 46.5 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cerebrium | Koyeb |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Model platform |
| Vendor | Cerebrium Inc. | Koyeb |
| Hosted endpoint | https://rest.cerebrium.ai | https://app.koyeb.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | Token |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-05-12 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 920 PyPI/wk | 72 stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cerebrium
Per-second GPU prices are public, a 94-operation OpenAPI spec covers the management API, and service account tokens expire and are limited to named projects. Deployed endpoints are callable without a token unless disable_auth = false is set, and no request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA were found in the reviewed documentation.
Koyeb
H100 at $2.50 and H200 at $3.00 an hour, billed per second. Changelog silent since 27 February 2026 and no CLI release since 12 May 2026.
Before you call either
Cerebrium
- Set
disable_auth = falseincerebrium.tomlbefore deploying. The default leaves the endpoint callable by anyone with the URL - Authenticate headless with
CEREBRIUM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN.cerebrium loginopens a browser - Raise
response_grace_periodfor long work. It defaults to 15 minutes and async runs stop at 12 hours - Send
?async=trueto get arun_idwith HTTP 202, and addwebhookEndpointbecause async calls return no result to the caller - Check the plan before choosing hardware. A100, H100, H200, B200 and RTX PRO 6000 need Standard, and
protectedcompute bills at twice the listed rate
Koyeb
- Pass
dry_runon service create or update to validate the definition before anything deploys - Page service lists with
limitandoffsetand filter bystatusesinstead of fetching everything - Expect the first request after deep sleep to take 1 to 5 seconds and retry once with a timeout
- Set
--min-scale 0on GPU services so idle instances stop billing - Re-check the Mistral transition before building anything long-lived on it
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cerebrium or Koyeb?
Cerebrium scores 55.3 (C) on agent readiness against Koyeb's 46.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Koyeb leads on reliability and agent ergonomics.
Other comparisons with Cerebrium or Koyeb
- Baseten vs Cerebrium
- Baseten vs Koyeb
- Beam vs Cerebrium
- Beam vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs CoreWeave
- Cerebrium vs Lambda Cloud
- Cerebrium vs Modal
- Cerebrium vs Northflank
- Cerebrium vs Replicate Deployments
- Cerebrium vs Runpod
- Cerebrium vs Vast.ai
- CoreWeave vs Koyeb
- Koyeb vs Lambda Cloud
- Koyeb vs Modal
- Koyeb vs Northflank
- Koyeb vs Replicate Deployments
- Koyeb vs Runpod
- Koyeb vs Vast.ai
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cerebrium-vs-koyeb.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cerebrium.json·/api/v1/tools/koyeb.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cerebrium koyeb(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cerebrium", "b": "koyeb"}at/mcp, no key