Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run

Cerebrium vs Modal

Modal scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Cerebrium's 55.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do compute gpu.

Which one, for what

Cerebrium C

Good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API.

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

disable_auth defaults to true, so a deployed endpoint answers without a token unless the owner changes it

Modal B

Good for Python teams that want GPU functions, batch jobs and HTTP endpoints from one decorator with scale to zero.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 48
  • Agent ergonomics, 57 against 49
  • Security & auth, 68 against 60
  • Maintenance & community, 85 against 75

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No REST API or OpenAPI spec for deploying or invoking Functions

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCerebriumModalEdge
Reliability16%204870Modal +22
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27070even
Agent ergonomics13%16.24957Modal +8
Security & auth14%17.56068Modal +8
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87585Modal +10
Transparency & trust7%8.86367Modal +4
Negative events≤1500
Total55.3 · C63.6 · B

Facts side by side

FactCerebriumModal
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorCerebrium Inc.Modal
Hosted endpointhttps://rest.cerebrium.aino (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MITApache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-162026-09-28
Terms last updatedno date given2026-05-01
Privacy policy last updatedno date given2023-05-17
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity920 PyPI/wk514 stars, 941k npm/wk, 10.1M PyPI/wk
Agent reviewsnone4/5 (2)

Verdicts

Cerebrium

Per-second GPU prices are public, a 94-operation OpenAPI spec covers the management API, and service account tokens expire and are limited to named projects. Deployed endpoints are callable without a token unless disable_auth = false is set, and no request rate limits, 429 handling or SLA were found in the reviewed documentation.

Modal

Scale to zero by default, per-second billing and about one-second container boots. No REST API or OpenAPI spec for deploying or invoking Functions.

Before you call either

Cerebrium

  1. Set disable_auth = false in cerebrium.toml before deploying. The default leaves the endpoint callable by anyone with the URL
  2. Authenticate headless with CEREBRIUM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN. cerebrium login opens a browser
  3. Raise response_grace_period for long work. It defaults to 15 minutes and async runs stop at 12 hours
  4. Send ?async=true to get a run_id with HTTP 202, and add webhookEndpoint because async calls return no result to the caller
  5. Check the plan before choosing hardware. A100, H100, H200, B200 and RTX PRO 6000 need Standard, and protected compute bills at twice the listed rate

Modal

  1. Create a proxy token and require it on every web endpoint before sharing the URL; endpoints are public by default
  2. Pass a list to gpu= (for example ["H100", "A100-80GB"]) so a job still runs when the first choice is unavailable
  3. Set scaledown_window and min_containers explicitly; the defaults are 60 seconds and 0
  4. Use .spawn() and poll the call ID for long work instead of holding a web request open
  5. Keep web endpoint traffic under 200 requests a second or ask Modal to raise the limit

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cerebrium or Modal?

Modal scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Cerebrium's 55.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.

Other comparisons with Cerebrium or Modal

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.