Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Lambda Cloud vs Modal
Modal has a score of 63.8 (B) against Lambda Cloud's 50.1 (D). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 80 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Lambda Cloud for
- agent ergonomics (+6)
Pick Modal for
- reliability (+20)
- security & auth (+8)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+80)
- transparency & trust (+10)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lambda Cloud | Modal | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 70 | Modal +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 69 | 70 | Modal +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 57 | Lambda Cloud +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 68 | Modal +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 30 | Modal +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 5 | 85 | Modal +80 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 59 | 69 | Modal +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 50.1 · D | 63.8 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lambda Cloud | Modal |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | Lambda | Modal |
| Hosted endpoint | https://cloud.lambda.ai/api/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-28 |
| Popularity | none | 514 stars, 941k npm/wk, 10.1M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 4/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Lambda Cloud
H100 SXM at $3.99 and B200 at $6.69 an hour with per-minute billing. No scale to zero, autoscaling or endpoints; an idle VM bills until terminated.
Modal
Scale to zero by default, per-second billing and about one-second container boots. No REST API or OpenAPI spec for deploying or invoking Functions.
Before you call either
Lambda Cloud
- Call
GET /instance-typesfirst and readregions_with_capacity_availablebefore trying to launch - Space launch calls 12 seconds apart; a sixth in a minute returns 429 with
global/rate-limited - Branch on the error
code, not themessageorsuggestion, which Lambda says may change - List instances before retrying a failed launch, since there's no idempotency key and a retry can start a second machine
- Terminate the instance in a
finallyblock; billing runs by the minute until you do
Modal
- Create a proxy token and require it on every web endpoint before sharing the URL; endpoints are public by default
- Pass a list to
gpu=(for example["H100", "A100-80GB"]) so a job still runs when the first choice is unavailable - Set
scaledown_windowandmin_containersexplicitly; the defaults are 60 seconds and 0 - Use
.spawn()and poll the call ID for long work instead of holding a web request open - Keep web endpoint traffic under 200 requests a second or ask Modal to raise the limit
Other comparisons with Lambda Cloud or Modal
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/lambda.json·/api/v1/tools/modal.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/lambda-vs-modal.md