Head to head · Compute gpu · October 2026 research run
Baseten vs Modal
Baseten has a score of 66.7 (B) against Modal's 63.8 (B). Both do compute gpu. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 14 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Baseten for
- reliability (+10)
- schema & documentation (+14)
- security & auth (+14)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+5)
Pick Modal for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baseten | Modal | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 70 | Baseten +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 70 | Baseten +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 57 | Modal +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 68 | Baseten +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Baseten +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 85 | Baseten +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 69 | Modal +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.7 · B | 63.8 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baseten | Modal |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | Baseten | Modal |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baseten.co | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-28 |
| Popularity | 1.2k stars, 74k PyPI/wk | 514 stars, 941k npm/wk, 10.1M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 4/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Baseten
Team API keys scoped to inference-only, metrics-only or a single environment or model, plus a Viewer role since 1 September 2026. H100 at $6.50 and A100 at $4.00 an hour, and start-up and idle replica time are billed.
Modal
Scale to zero by default, per-second billing and about one-second container boots. No REST API or OpenAPI spec for deploying or invoking Functions.
Before you call either
Baseten
- Create a team key with inference-only permission for calling models and keep full-access keys out of the agent
- Sleep for
retry_afterseconds on a 429 from api.baseten.co; the activate and deactivate endpoints allow 20 calls a minute - Retry 429, 503 and 529 with backoff, but treat 500 as a bug in your model code
- Set
scale_down_delaybelow the 900-second default or every burst bills 15 idle minutes - Send payloads over 256 KiB to
/predict, not/async_predict, unless support has raised the async limit
Modal
- Create a proxy token and require it on every web endpoint before sharing the URL; endpoints are public by default
- Pass a list to
gpu=(for example["H100", "A100-80GB"]) so a job still runs when the first choice is unavailable - Set
scaledown_windowandmin_containersexplicitly; the defaults are 60 seconds and 0 - Use
.spawn()and poll the call ID for long work instead of holding a web request open - Keep web endpoint traffic under 200 requests a second or ask Modal to raise the limit
Other comparisons with Baseten or Modal
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/baseten.json·/api/v1/tools/modal.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/baseten-vs-modal.md